Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec;38(6):554–562. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1839

Table II.

Perforation size and location.

Variables Native Tissue Group
(n = 33)
MegaDerm Group
(n = 27)
Small
• Anterosuperior
• Anteroinferior
• Posterosuperior
• Posterioinferior
• Central
16 (48.5%)
4
11
0
0
1
13 (48.1%)
0
11
0
1
1
Medium
• Anterior
• Posterior
• Inferior
• Central
16 (48.5%)
7
0
6
3
9 (33.3%)
4
1
4
0
Large 1 (3.0%) 4 (14.8%)
Total 0 (0) 1 (3.8%)

The proportion of perforation sites in the small-sized and medium-sized perforations did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.215 and p = 0.528, respectively). Graft success rates did not differ based on perforation size (small vs medium, p = 0.303) or location (anterior vs posterior, p = 0.503).