Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;18:5. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0899-5

Table 4.

Standardized estimates of total, direct and indirect effects of the predictive model of oral health structure in PHC. Brazilian capitals, 2010–2012

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
SFLa P SFLa P SFLa P SFLa P
Caries➔Outcome
 Total effect −0.645 0.053 0.209 0.316 0.331 0.102 0.219 0.316
 Direct effect −0.620 0.076 0.209 0.323 0.331 0.109 0.269 0.189
 Indirect total effect −0.025 0.803 < 0.01 0.996 < 0.01 0.997 −0.051 0.642
 Specific indirect effect
  Caries➔Coverage➔Outcome −0.025 0.803 < 0.01 0.996 < 0.01 0.997 −0.051 0.642
SES➔Outcome
 Total effect 0.221 0.248 0.431 0.010 0.449 0.012 0.532 < 0.002
 Direct effect −0.115 0.750 0.612 0.010 0.727 0.008 0.934 0.001
 Indirect total effect 0.337 0.314 −0.181 0.280 −0.279 0.142 −0.302 0.130
 Specific indirect effects
  SES➔Coverage➔Outcome −0.107 0.386 −0.034 0.685 −0.046 0.645 −0.150 0.314
  SES➔Caries➔Outcome 0.426 0.155 −0.147 0.327 −0.233 0.147 −0.187 0.199
  SES➔Caries➔Coverage➔Outcome 0.017 0.804 < 0.01 0.996 < 0.01 0.997 0.035 0.646

SFL Standard factor loading, SES Socioeconomic status construct

Significant p-value (p ≤ 0.05) in bold

aReference for standard factor loading: small effect < 0,10; Medium – around 0.30; Large > 0.50