Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018 May 16;1090:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.05.008

Table 6.

Stabilities of DHT, α-diol, and β-diol under various test conditions (n = 5).

Condition Temperature Sample Recovery ± SD (%)
DHT α-diol β-diol
6h 24 h 6h 24 h 6h 24 h
Bench-top 23 °C Stock solutiona 102 ± 1 100 ± 1 100 ± 2 99 ± 3 101 ± 2 100 ± 1
Stock solutionb 99 ± 2 101 ± 1 100 ± 3 98 ± 4 99 ± 3 99 ± 2
Bench-top 23 °C Low QCc 94 ± 1 92 ± 3 93 ± 2 94 ± 4 91 ± 6 92 ± 3
High QCc 92 ± 2 91 ± 4 91 ± 4 92 ± 2 94 ± 5 93 ± 5
Auto sampler 4°C Low QC 97 ± 3 99 ± 5 101 ± 2 99 ± 3 97 ± 4 99 ± 3
HighQC 96 ± 5 98 ± 4 102 ± 4 100 ± 3 101 ± 1 98 ± 4
3 Freeze-thaw cycles −20°C to 23 °C Low QC 100 ± 3 98 ± 3 99 ± 2 104 ± 2 97 ± 5 99 ± 3
HighQC 101 ± 5 102 ± 2 95 ± 4 100 ± 4 101 ± 4 104 ± 2
Long-term. (40 days) −70°C Low QC 93 ± 3 94 ± 5 95 ± 6
HighQC 97 ± 5 98 ± 6 92 ± 5
a

The concentration of the stock solution was 1.00 mg/mL, which was measured by serial dilution to 0.150 ng/mL in the mobile phase.

b

The concentration of the stock solution was 1.00 mg/mL, which was measured by serial dilution to 40.0 ng/mL in the mobile phase.

c

The concentrations of sera low and high QCs were 0.150 ng/mL and 40.0 ng/mL, respectively.