Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Gerontol. 2018 May 3;108:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.023

Table 2.

Association between baseline usual health care provider and incidence of frailty.

Incidence per
1000 persons-
year
Basic
adjusteda
HR
(95%CI)
p value Fully
adjustedb
HR
(95%CI)
p value
Private
  doc-
  tors
10 (9–12) 1 [reference] 1 [reference]
Public
  clinic
27 (17–42) 2.73
(1.69–4.41)
< 0.001 1.56
(1.07–2.70)
0.03
HMO 17 (12–23) 1.65
(1.15–2.38)
0.007 1.48
(1.03–2.24)
0.03
Hospital/
  ED
24 (15–37) 2.72
(1.68–4.38)
< 0.001 1.76
(1.03–3.02)
0.04

Notes: All the data are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals.

Abbreviations: CI: confidence intervals; HR: hazard ratio; ED: emergency department; HMO health maintenance organization.

a

Basic adjusted model included age and sex.

b

Fully adjusted model included as covariates: age (as continuous); sex; race (whites vs. others); body mass index (as continuous); education (degree vs. others); smoking habits (current and previous vs. others); yearly income (categorized as ≥ or < 50,000$ and missing data); Physical Activity Scale for Elderly score (as continuous); Charlson co-morbidity index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; total energy intake (as continuous); number of frailty indexes at baseline (one vs. none); medical insurance (yes vs. no); transitions in health care during follow-up period.