Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 25;47(8):20180100. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180100

Table 3.

Total number of proximal surfaces diagnosed as “healthy”, caries restricted to “enamel” and caries extending into “dentin” by the five evaluators (400 proximal faces), distributed according to the different variations of brightness and contrast

Brightness and contrast variations Gold-standard (micro-CT) Total 
(n = 400)
Healthy 
(n = 160)
Enamel 
(n = 140)
Dentine 
(n = 100)
V1
Healthy 140 (87.5) 92 (65.7) 47 (47) 279
Enamel 16 (10) 40 (28.6) 35 (35) 91
Dentine 4 (2.5) 8 (5.7) 18 (18) 30
V2
Healthy 139 (86.9) 90 (64.3) 45 (45) 274
Enamel 20 (12.5) 48 (34.3) 40 (40) 108
Dentine 1 (0.6) 2 (1.4) 15 (15) 18
V3
Healthy 138 (86.3) 94 (67.1) 46 (46) 278
Enamel 19 (11.9) 41 (29.3) 40 (40) 100
Dentine 3 (1.9) 5 (3.6) 14 (14) 22
V4
Healthy 147 (91.9) 101 (72.1) 52 (52) 300
Enamel 12 (7.5) 35 (25) 36 (36) 83
Dentine 1 (0.6) 4 (2.9) 12 (12) 17
V5
Healthy 157 (98.1) 119 (85) 69 (69) 345
Enamel 3 (1.9) 21 (15) 25 (25) 49
Dentine 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (6) 6

p > 0.001 according to McNemar Bowker test, for all brightness and contrast variations evaluated.