Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210549

Table 1. PET/CT quantification of known volumes with different activity of 18F-FDG inside an anthropomorphic phantom.

PET grid → CT grid CT grid → Dose calculation grid

Interpolation method
V1
(% deviation from the real
0.30 ml)
V2
(% deviation from the real
0.30 ml)
V3
(% deviation from the real
2.00 ml)
V2 + V3
(% deviation from the real
2.30 ml)

Interpolation method
V1
(% deviation from the real
0.30 ml)
V2
(% deviation from the real
0.30 ml)
V3
(% deviation from the real
2.00 ml)
V2 + V3
(% deviation from the real
2.30 ml)
Linear 0.38
(+26.7)
0.40
(+33.3)
1.96
(-2.0)
2.36
(+2.6)
Linear 0.35
(+16.7)
0.42
(+40.0)
2.21
(+10.5)
2.63
(+14.3)
Nearest-neighbor 0.38
(+26.7)
0.40
(+33.3)
1.94
(-3.0)
2.34
(+1.7)
Spline 0.64
(+113.3)
0.50
(+66.7)
2.43
(+21.5)
2.93
(+27.4)
Nearest-neighbor 0.34
(+13.3)
0.41
(+36.7)
1.86
(-7.0)
2.27
(-1.3)
Linear 0.31
(+3.3)
0.45
(+50.0)
1.95
(-2.5)
2.40
(+4.3)
Nearest-neighbor 0.32
(+6.7)
0.36
(+20.0)
1.85
(-7.5)
2.21
(-3.9)
Spline 0.60
(+100.0)
0.53
(+76.7)
2.34
(+17.0)
2.87
(+24.8)
Spline 0.36
(+20.0)
0.35
(+16.7)
1.91
(-4.5)
2.26
(-1.7)
Linear 0.31
(+3.3)
0.38
(+26.7)
2.09
(+4.5)
2.47
(+7.4)
Nearest-neighbor 0.35
(+16.7)
0.33
(+10.0)
1.91
(-4.5)
2.24
(-2.6)
Spline 0.60
(+100.0)
0.43
(+43.3)
2.41
(+20.5)
2.84
(+23.5)

Evaluation of different combination of interpolation methods for co-registration of image dataset from PET (1.6 x 1.6 x 1.5 mm voxel size)/CT (1.52 x 1.52 x 1.5 mm3 voxel size) with 512x512 pixels per slice and the dose calculation grid with 256x256 pixels per slice.