Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0209746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209746

Table 1. Characteristics of selected studies.

Author, year, country Participants,
Sample size
Intervention/ Control Intervention length, Follow-up (FU) from baseline, Retention rate Intervention provider Outcomes Significance difference between groups
RCT, Hospital-based
Kalarchian et. al., 2007, USA • Age: 8–12 years
• Obese (BMI percentile ≥97th), no comorbidities & not on medications to affect weight
Parent participation
Sample size: 192
(IG: 97; CG: 95)
Family based intervention
• 20 weekly 60-minutes group sessions for 6 months
• 6 booster sessions (3 group sessions + 3 telephone calls) between 6 & 12 months
• Behavioural strategies: goal setting, problem solving & self-regulation skills
• PA: education to ↑ PA & ↓ sedentary activities/screen time < 15hours/week
• Diet: Traffic light Eating Plan
Control: usual care– 2 nutrition consultation to develop individual nutrition plan (Traffic light Eating Plan)
12 months
FU:
18 months
Retention:
At 12 months:
IG: 75.3%
CG: 69.5%
At 18 months:
IG: 83.5%
CG: 85.3%
Lifestyle coach, dietitian Primary:
1. Percent overweight (%OW)
Secondary:
1. Waist circumference
2. Body fat (DEXA scan)
Did not measure PA & dietary intake
Measured metabolic health outcomes:
BP
Yes, for waist circumference and body fat percentage at 12 months (no measurements done at 18 months)
No, for %OW at 12 and 18 months
Golley et. el., 2007, Australia • Age: 6–9 years
• Obese (BMI z-≤3.5), no comorbidities & not on medications to affect weight
Parent participation
Sample size: 111 (3-arm RCT)
(IGP: 37; IGP+DA: 38; CG: 36)
IGP: Intensive lifestyle education
• Based on Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) to promote child’s behavior on dietary + activity
• 4 weekly 2-hour group sessions
• 15–20 minutes of 4 weekly then 3 monthly individual telephone sessions
IGP+DA:
• Parent: Triple P + 7 intensive lifestyle support group sessions (family focused healthy eating)
• Child: structured supervised aerobic activities (details not stated)
Control: wait-listed; received general “Healthy Lifestyle” pamphlet + 3–4 5-minutes telephone call (retention strategy)
6 months
FU:
12 months
Retention:
At 12 months:
IGP: 78.4%
IGP+DA: 81.6%
CG: 86.1%
Dietitian, PA experts Primary:
1. BMI z-scores
Secondary:
1. Waist circumference
Did not measure PA & dietary intake
Measured metabolic health outcomes:
BP, glucose, Lipids profile
No measurements for CG at 6 months for comparison
No, for BMI z-score & waist circumference at 12 months
RCT, Hospital-based
di Niet et. al., 2012, Netherlands • Age: 7–12 years
• Overweight (BMI SDS >1.1) or obese (BMI SDS >2.3)
• no comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 114
(IG: 73; CG: 68)
Self-monitoring of lifestyle behaviour via a short message service maintenance treatment (SMSMT) using mobile phones with personalized feedback
• 8 group sessions in 3 months
• Behavioural strategies: coping skills, goal setting, problem solving & self-regulation skills
• PA: exercise behavior–content was not stated
• Diet: healthy eating–content was not stated
Control: Same content as IG but no SMSMT
3 months
FU:
12 months
Retention:
Measured at 12 months only:
IG: 86.3%
CG: 69.1%
Psychologist, dietitian, paediatrician & physiotherapist Primary:
1. BMI SDS (z-scores)
Secondary:
1. Eating behavior (Dutch Eating behavior questionnaire)
Did not measure PA
None for BMI SD scores or eating behavior
Hystad et. al. 2013, Norway • Age: 7–12 years
• Obese (BMI z-scores ≥2)
• No comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 99
(IG: 47; CG: 52)
Therapist-led group (TLG) to enhance parental competence to accomplish targeted lifestyle changes
• 10 group sessions + 5 individual sessions on diet and PA
• Written manual
• Physical activity: at least 1 hour/day of moderate intensity & max. 2 hour/day sedentary behavior
• Diet: Healthy eating
Control: Self-help group (principle of mutual help, derived from the participants’ own experiences and knowledge. No education or guidance to improve weight
6 months
FU:
24 months
Retention:
At 6 months:
IG: 89.3%
CG: 90.4%
At 24 months:
IG: 76.6%
CG: 84.6%
Psychologists, dietitians, paediatricians & physiotherapists Primary:
1. Body fat (DEXA scan)
2. BMI z-scores
3. Dietary intake (4-day food record: Norwegian Food composition table)
Did not measure PA
None for body fat, BMI z-score and diet
RCT, Clinic-based
Estabrooks et. al., 2009, USA • Age: 8–12 years
• Overweight or obese (BMI percentile ≥85th)
• Did not state about comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 220 (3-arm RCT)
(IGFC: 50; IGGroup: 85; IGIVR:85)
Family connection (FC) Interventions
• FC-workbook: self-help connection 61-pages workbook for parents & served as control group
• FC group: workbook + 2-hours x 2 weekly group sessions with dietitian
• FC interactive voice response (IVR) counselling: workbook+ group sessions +10 automated IVR tailored counselling sessions over 20 weeks
• Behavioural strategies: goal setting, problem solving & role modelling
• PA: education to ↑ PA & ↓ sedentary activities/TV viewing
• Diet: education on healthy eating
6 months
FU:12 months
Retention:
At 6 months
IGFC:76%
IGGroup:75%
IGIVR: 80%
At 12 months:
IGFC:72%
IGGroup:66%
IGIVR: 74%
Dietitian (for IGGroup & IGIVR) & research team Primary:
1. BMI z-score
Secondary:
1. Dietary intake (Block Kids Questionnaire)
2. PA (Youth Behavior Risk Survey)
Yes, for BMI z-score
Reduced in IGIVR compared to IG FC or IGGroup at 6 & 12 months
No, for PA and dietary intake over time
RCT, Research clinic-based
Wafa et. al., 2011, Malaysia • Age: 7–11 years
• Obese (BMI percentile >95th), no comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 107
(IG: 52; CG: 55)
Adapted program from Scottish Childhood Obesity Treatment Trial
• Parent: 8 8-hour group sessions over 26 weeks with dietitian + 1 session with clinical psychologist for behavioural strategies (self-monitoring, goal setting, problem solving & relapse prevention)
• PA education (↑ PA & ↓ sedentary activities/TV viewing)
• Diet: education on Traffic light eating plans)
• Child: PA sessions (details not provided)
Control: delayed treatment after 6 months
6 months
FU: none
Retention:
IG: 65%
CG: 84%
Dietitian, clinical psychologist. Exercise instructor Primary:
1. BMI z-score
2. BMI
Secondary:
1. PA (accelerometer)
Dietary intake not measured
No, for BMI z-score & PA
Boutelle et. al., 2013, USA • Age: 8–12 years
• Overweight or obese (BMI percentile 85th to 98th), no comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 50
(IG: 25; CG: 25)
Guided self-help pediatric obesity (GSH-PO)
• Behavioural program with12 individual sessions over 5 months (alternate week visits for 20 minutes each),
• Written manual for child & parent and activities manual & self-monitoring booklets
• Behavioural strategies (stimulus control, motivation, cognitive skils, social support & relapse prevention)
• PA education (↑ PA & ↓ sedentary activities)
• Diet: education on Traffic light eating plans)
Control: delayed treatment after 5 months
5 months
FU: 11 months
Retention:
IG: 92% at 5 months; no loss to FU at 11 months
CG: 100%
Graduate student in clinical psychology Primary:
1. BMI
2. BMI z-score
3. % OW
Secondary:
1. Dietary intake (3 days 24-hour diet recall)
2. PA (accelerometer)
Yes, for BMI, BMI z-score & %OW at 5 months
Yes, for BMI z-score & %OW at 11 months for IG but no control group
No for PA and dietary intake over time
RCT, School based
Kalavainen et. al., 2007, Finland • Age: 7–9 years
• Obese (weight for height of 120 to 200%)
• No comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 70
(IG: 35; CG: 35)
Family-centred group program focus on behavioural & solution-oriented therapy
• 15 group sessions of 90 minutes
• Written manual
• Behavioural strategies: cognitive behavioural therapy workbook (Magnificent Kids)
• PA: education on ↑ PA & ↓ sedentary activities
• Diet: education on healthy diet & meal pattern
Control: Routine counseling (booklet on weight management, eating habits & PA + 2 individual sessions with school nurse)
6 months
FU: 12 months
Retention:
IG & CG: 97.1% at 6 months, no loss to FU at 12 months
Dietitian, school nurses Primary:
1. Weight for height
Secondary:
1. BMI
2. BMI SD scores (z-scores)
PA or dietary intake were not measured as an outcome
Yes, for weight for height, BMI & BMI-SDS at 6 months
Yes, for weight for height & BMI at 12 months
RCT, Home-based
Goldfield et al., 2006, Canada • Age: 8–12 years
• Overweight (BMI percentile 85th to 94th) or obese (BMI percentile >94th)
• Watching TV (VCR/DVD or video games) >15 hours
• <30 minutes physical activities
• No condition that limits PA
Parent participation
Sample size: 30
(IG: 14; CG: 16)
Open-loop feedback (requires person to do PA, accelerometer measure PA objectively, which provide feedback. Child will be rewarded access to television when perform PA) + reinforcement by a parent
• Bi weekly meeting with research team to determine the amount of television time based on the accelerometer
• PA accumulated will be rewarded with access to television
• Diet: None
Control: Open-loop feedback only
8 weeks
FU: none
Retention:
100% both groups
Not stated Primary:
1. BMI
Secondary:
1. PA (accelerometer)
2. PA (Past Day PA Recall + television viewing time)
3. Dietary intake (3 days 24-hour diet recall)
Yes, for BMI, PA, television viewing time, fat intake, calories from snacks &snack intake during television watching
Maddison et al., 2014, New Zealand • Age: 9–12 years
• Used electronic media (≥15 hours per week,)
• Overweight or obese (as per Cole International cut-points)
• No condition that limits PA
Parent/primary caregiver participation
Sample size: 251
(IG: 127; CG:124)
Screen-Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home(SWITCH)
• One face-to-face individual education and support for primary caregivers to reduce media use at home.
• Monthly e-newsletter on reduced screen-based activity & links to community-based programs
• Behavioural strategies: self-monitoring, role modelling
• PA: focus on sedentary behavior
• Diet: none
Control: usual care
24 weeks
FU: None
Retention:
IG: 95%
CG: 94%
Primary caregivers Primary:
1. BMI z-scores
Secondary:
1. BMI
2. Waist circumference
3. Body fat (BIA)
4. PA (7-day physical activity questionnaire + sedentary activity)
5. Dietary intake (Food frequency questionnaire)
None for BMI z-scores, BMI, waist circumference, body fat, PA (including sedentary time) and dietary intake
RCT, Community-based
Nemet et al., 2008, Israel • Age: 8–11 years
• Obese (BMI percentile >95th)
• No comorbidities
• Not on medications that interfere with growth or weight control
Parent participation
Sample size: 22
(IG: 11; CG:11)
• PA: 2x a week of 1-hour training group session + 1x/week movement therapy group session at Sport Centre + 30–45 minutes home-based walking/weight bearing exercise 2x/week + reduce sedentary behaviour
• Diet: 14 sessions with dietitian on food pyramid with written dietary information & received balanced hypocaloric diet
Control: 1 x nutritional consultation & instructed to perform physical activity three times per week on their own
3 months
FU: None
Retention:
100% for both groups
Dietitian, sports trainers, movement therapists Did not specify which outcomes as primary or secondary outcomes
1. BMI percentile
2. BMI
3. Body fat (BIA)
4. Screen time
5. Diet (2 day 48-hour diet recall)
Yes, for BMI percentiles & screen time
Nemet et al., 2013, Israel • Age: 7–9 years
• Obese
• (BMI percentile >98th)
• No comorbidities
• Not on medication causing obesity
Parent participation
Sample size: 45
(IG: 25; CG: 20)
• PA: 2x a week of 1-hour training group session + 1x/week movement therapy group session at Sport Centre + 30–45 minutes home-based walking/weight bearing exercise 2x/week + reduce sedentary behavior
• Diet: 14 sessions with dietitian on food pyramid with written dietary information & received balanced hypocaloric diet
Control: one nutritional consultation and instructed to perform physical activity daily
3 months
FU: None
Retention:
IG: 88%
CG: 90%
Dietitian, sports trainers, movement therapists Did not specify the primary or secondary outcomes
1. Weight
2. BMI percentile
3. BMI
4. Skinfolds (triceps & subscapular)
5. Body fat (BIA)
6. Physical activity pattern (METS)
7. Screen time
Yes, for weight, BMI, BMI percentile, skinfolds & PA
Sacher et al., 2010, UK • Age: 8–12 years
• Obese (BMI percentile ≥ 98th)
• No comorbidities
Parent participation
Sample size: 116 (IG: 60; CG:56)
Mind, Exercise, Nutrition, Do it (MEND) program
• Group based sessions for 9 weeks at community venues
• 12-weeks of free family swim pass
• Behavioural strategies: 8 sessions in 9 weeks on stimulus control, goal setting, reinforcement, response prevention
• PA: 18 group exercise sessions for 1 hour, over 9 weeks
• Diet: 8 group nutrition education sessions on healthy eating with written instructions
Control: Wait-list
6 months
FU:
12 months
Retention:
IG: 61.7%
CG: 80.3%
Dietitians, Health trainers Did not specify the primary or secondary outcomes
1. Weight
2. Waist circumference
3. Lean body mass (BIA)
4. Fat mass (BIA)
5. Body fat (BIA)
6. BMI z-score
7. BMI
8. Physical activity (hour/week) (non-validated questionnaire + sedentary activity)
Measured metabolic health outcomes:
BP
Yes, for waist circumference, BMI z-score, BMI & sedentary activity at 6 months
Yes, for waist circumference, BMI z-scores & PA at 12 months but no comparison control group
Quasi-experimental, Hospital-based
Shalitin et. al. 2009, Israel • Age: 6–11 years
• Obese (BMI percentile >95th)
• No comorbidities
• Not using medication that might interfere with weight control
Sample size: 162 (IGEx = 52, IGDiet = 55, IGDietEx = 55)
IGEx: Exercise intervention (3-day weekly, 90 minutes per training group session) directed by 3 professional coaches
IGDiet: Diet education with 12 weekly of 60 minutes group sessions with a dietician with written information on food pyramid and healthy eating. Also prescribed on balanced hypocaloric diet
IGDietEx: Combination of both interventions
12 weeks
FU:
52 weeks
Retention:
IGEx: 42.3%
IGDiet: 49.1% IGDietEx: 50.9%
Exercise professional coaches, dietitians Did not specify the primary or secondary outcomes
1. Waist circumference
2. Body fat (BIA)
3. BMI SDS (z scores)
4. BMI
PA and dietary intake were not measured as an outcome
Yes, for BMI SDS (GDiet and IGDietEx compared to IGEx at 12 and 52 weeks)
None between IGDiet and IGDietEx over time

NOTE: RCT = randomised controlled trial, BMI = body mass index, SDS = Standard deviation scores, IG = intervention group, CG = control group, PA = physical activity, SD = standard deviation, BP = blood pressure, DEXA = Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, BIA = Bio-impedance analysis