Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;23:17-136. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-136

Table 3.

Youth, parent, and practitioner reaction to and endorsement of syncope prevention techniques not currently implemented in usual care

Technique Youth (Y)/Parent (P) Clinician endorsements/reactions
Level of Support, no. in favor of technique Reactions
Patient education 3Y/2P Unsure if education would affect fainting/syncope outcomes YES, if educational information is given or sent before visit with no impact on clinic workflow
4Y/2P Support providing education materials; proactive approach
Water consumption 8Y/5P No experience but willing to try before visit; teens admitted not being well hydrated YES, willing to offer water at check-in; not realistic to wait 30 min during visit before vaccination
Sodium consumption 8Y/5P Some concern about increased sodium for general health; willing to try salty snack before visit NO, had never heard of this and skeptical of it; possibly willing to offer salty food at time of check-in
Caffeine consumption 3Y Likes drinking cola; open to this idea NO, had never heard of this and skeptical of it; do not want to promote caffeine consumption by youth
4Y/5P Concern about increased “jitteriness” or creating an adverse reaction to the shot; concern about caffeine on health, physical development
Applied muscle tension 7Y/4P Unsure of potential benefit beyond distraction; open to this idea, squeeze stress ball Maybe, if no time impact; unsure if this would be helpful and could increase tension in arm
2Y Already practice this technique on own