Table 3. Enrichment analysis of the effect of FoxM1 expression on related signaling pathways in ICC.

No.	Signaling pathways	ES	NES	Nom P-value	FDR q-value
1	PID_MYC_PATHWAY	0.583	1.705	0.016	0.089
2	PID_MYC_ACTIV_PATHWAY	0.601	1.973	0.000	0.009
3	PID_ATM_PATHWAY	0.635	1.871	0.001	0.026
4	PID_ATR_PATHWAY	0.745	2.121	0.000	0.001
5	PID_MET_PATHWAY	0.463	1.464	0.098	0.225
6	KEGG_P53_SIGNALING_PATHWAY	0.612	2.079	0.000	0.003
7	PID_P53_REGULATION_PATHWAY	0.545	1.728	0.004	0.077
8	PID_P53_DOWNSTREAM_PATHWAY	0.472	1.744	0.003	0.071
9	PID_WNT_CANONICAL_PATHWAY	0.574	1.547	0.050	0.172
10	REACTOME_SIGNALING_BY_WNT	0.528	1.555	0.081	0.169
11	REACTOME_INTRINSIC_PATHWAY_FOR_APOPTOSIS	0.537	1.643	0.020	0.129
12	PID_TELOMERASE_PATHWAY	0.476	1.539	0.051	0.170
13	PID_TAP63_PATHWAY	0.471	1.568	0.031	0.165
14	PID_PLK1_PATHWAY	0.791	2.076	0.000	0.003
15	PID_P38_MK2_PATHWAY	0.550	1.524	0.040	0.178
16	PID_FOXO_PATHWAY	0.532	1.561	0.047	0.167
17	PID_BARD1_PATHWAY	0.759	1.983	0.000	0.009

Abbreviations: ES, enrichment Score; NES, normalized enrichment score; Nom P-value, nominal p-value; FDR q-value, false discovery rate q-value. FDR q-value < 0.250 was considered different.