Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):273–278. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562017000000216

Table 2. Comparison between the genders in terms of clinical characteristics, level of asthma control, lung function, nutritional status, and health-related quality of life.a .

Variable Females Males p*
(n = 162) (n = 36)
Age, yearsb 56.3 ± 14.2 55.7 ± 17.8 0.805
Race
White 116 (72) 33 (91.7) 0.024
Non-White 45 (28) 3 (8.3)
Age at diagnosis, yearsc 18 (43) 29 (44) 0.021
Smoking status
Never smoker 116 (71.6) 22 (61.1) 0.150
Former smoker 46 (28.4) 14 (38.9)
GINA asthma severity classification
Mild 21 (13) 2 (5.6) 0.401
Moderate 24 (14.8) 7 (19.4)
Severe 117 (72.2) 27 (75)
GINA asthma control
Well-controlled/partly controlled 60 (37.0) 20 (55.6) 0.041
Uncontrolled 102 (63.0) 16 (44.4)
Nutritional markersb
BMI, kg/m2 30.2 ± 5.8 26.9 ± 4.5 0.002
Body fat, % 37.4 ± 6.4 26.5 ± 7.4 < 0.001
Comorbidities 111 (68.5) 14 (38.9) 0.001
Cardiovascular comorbidities 94 (58.0) 13 (36.1) 0.028
Pre-bronchodilator lung functionb
FVC, L 2.3 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 1.0 < 0.001
FVC, % predicted 83.2 ± 20.9 76.3 ± 22.0 0.078
FEV1, L 1.6 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.9 < 0.001
FEV1, % predicted 69.5 ± 21.7 62.4 ± 23.9 0.085
FEV1/FVC, % predicted 82.4 ± 12.3 80.8 ± 15.9 0.492
Quality of lifeb
Symptoms 3.8 ± 1.5 4.6 ± 1.7 0.006
Activity limitation 3.6 ± 1.3 4.4 ± 1.5 0.001
Emotional function 3.6 ± 1.9 4.5 ± 1.7 0.014
Environmental stimuli 3.2 ± 1.6 4.3 ± 1.9 0.001

GINA: Global Initiative for Asthma; and BMI: body mass index. *Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. aData expressed as n (%), except where otherwise indicated. bData expressed as mean ± SD. cData expressed as median (interquartile range).