Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2019 Feb;73(2):335–341. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12225

Table 4.

Utility of different blood pressure measurement components and their combinations in childhood to predict adult high cIMT (age-, sex- and study-specific ≥ 90th percentile).

Method for
prediction
Diastolic V Diastolic IV P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.669 (0.646–0.693) 0.670 (0.647–0.694) 0.37
IDI 0.0012 0.002
NRI 0.05 0.25

Systolic Systolic + Diastolic V P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.677 (0.657–0.704) 0.678 (0.655–0.700) 0.32
IDI 0.0001 0.78
NRI 0.007 0.12

Systolic Systolic + PP V* P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.677 (0.657–0.704) 0.678 (0.655–0.700) 0.40
IDI 0.0001 0.70
NRI 0.072 0.10

PP V* PP V* + MAP V* P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.673 (0.651–0.694) 0.677 (0.655–0.699) 0.09
IDI 0.002 0.005
NRI 0.066 0.15

MAP V* PP V* + MAP V* P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.667 (0.645–0.689) 0.677 (0.655–0.699) 0.005
IDI 0.035 0.001
NRI 0.15 0.011

PP V* + MAP V* Systolic + Diastolic V P for difference

AUC (95%CI) 0.677 (0.655–0.699) 0.678 (0.656–0.700) 0.25
IDI 0.0003 0.23
NRI 0.014 0.76
*

Diastolic V was used in the MAP V and PP V models

AUC: Area under the curve, IDI: integrated discrimination index, NRI: net reclassification index; MAP: mean arterial pressure, PP: pulse pressure, cIMT: carotid intima-media thickness