Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 5;68(6):913–918. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy558

Table 3:

Sensitivity of treponemal assays for detection of syphilis, by stage (n=262)

Assay Primary
(n=55)
Secondary
(n=98)
Early Latent
(N=41)
Late Latent
(N=68)
FTA-ABS 78.2%* (65.0–88.2) 92.8%* (85.7–97.0) 100% (90.7–100) 92.6% (83.7–97.6)
TP-PA 94.5% (84.9–98.9) 100% (96.2–100) 100% (90.7–100) 86.8% (76.4–93.8)
Centaur CIA 94.5% (84.9–98.9) 100% (96.2–100) 100% (90.7–100) 94.1 % (85.6–98.4)
TrepSure EIA 94.5% (84.9–98.9) 100% (96.2–100) 100% (90.7–100) 98.5% (92.1–99.9)
LIAISON CIA 96.4% (94.5–98.2) 100% (96.2–100) 97.6% (87.4–99.9) 92.6% (83.7–97.6)
Bioplex MBIA 96.4% (94.5–98.2) 100% (96.2–100) 95.1% (83.8–99.4) 94.1 % (85.6–98.4)
INNO-LIA 96.4% (94.5–98.2) 100% (96.2–100) 100% (90.7–100) 91.1% (81.7–96.7)
*

FTA-ABS was less sensitive than other assays for primary syphilis (all p ≤0.01) and secondary syphilis (p=0.007)

TP-PA significantly less sensitive than TrepSure EIA for late latent syphilis (p=0.009), all other comparisons were not statistically significant.