Table 3:
Assay | Primary (n=55) |
Secondary (n=98) |
Early Latent (N=41) |
Late Latent (N=68) |
---|---|---|---|---|
FTA-ABS | 78.2%* (65.0–88.2) | 92.8%* (85.7–97.0) | 100% (90.7–100) | 92.6% (83.7–97.6) |
TP-PA | 94.5% (84.9–98.9) | 100% (96.2–100) | 100% (90.7–100) | 86.8%† (76.4–93.8) |
Centaur CIA | 94.5% (84.9–98.9) | 100% (96.2–100) | 100% (90.7–100) | 94.1 % (85.6–98.4) |
TrepSure EIA | 94.5% (84.9–98.9) | 100% (96.2–100) | 100% (90.7–100) | 98.5% (92.1–99.9) |
LIAISON CIA | 96.4% (94.5–98.2) | 100% (96.2–100) | 97.6% (87.4–99.9) | 92.6% (83.7–97.6) |
Bioplex MBIA | 96.4% (94.5–98.2) | 100% (96.2–100) | 95.1% (83.8–99.4) | 94.1 % (85.6–98.4) |
INNO-LIA | 96.4% (94.5–98.2) | 100% (96.2–100) | 100% (90.7–100) | 91.1% (81.7–96.7) |
FTA-ABS was less sensitive than other assays for primary syphilis (all p ≤0.01) and secondary syphilis (p=0.007)
TP-PA significantly less sensitive than TrepSure EIA for late latent syphilis (p=0.009), all other comparisons were not statistically significant.