Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;22(1):71–79. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1222-y

Table 2.

Inter-individual comparisons for each acoustic parameter of coo calls from adult male R. roxellana

Parameter Kruskal–Wallis test Pairs for which differences were detected based on Mann–Whitney U tests*
χ 2 P value
Duration 52.71 < 0.001 DD-GE, DD-XZ, DW-GE, GE-HH, GE-NN, GE-XB, HH-XB, HH-XZ, NN-XB, NN-XZ
Mean f0 74.34 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-GE, DD-HH, DD-NN, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-HH, DW-XB, GE-HH, GE-XB, HH-XZ, NN-XZ
XB-XZ
SD f0 23.65 0.001 DW-GE, DW-XZ
Max f0 40.02 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-GE, DD-NN, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-NN, DW-XB, GE-NN, NN-XZ, XB-XZ
Min f0 59.62 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-GE, DD-HH, DD-NN, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-XB, GE-HH, GE-NN, GE-XB, HH-XZ, NN-XZ
XB-XZ
Range f0 13.88 0.031 GE-XB
Start f0 60.04 < 0.001 DD-GE, DD-NN, DD-XZ, DW-GE, DW-NN, DW-XZ, GE-HH, HH-NN, HH-XB, HH-XZ, XB-XZ
End f0 45.16 < 0.001 DD-GE, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-NN, GE-NN, NN-XB, NN-XZ
HNR 69.65 < 0.001 DD-GE, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-GE, DW-XZ, GE-HH, GE-NN, GE-XB, HH-NN, NN-XB, NN-XZ
F 1 47.39 < 0.001 DD-DW, DW-GE, DW-NN, DW-XB, DW-XZ, HH-XB, HH-XZ
F 2 76.88 < 0.001 DD-GE, DD-HH, DD-NN, DD-XB, DD-XZ, DW-GE, DW-HH, DW-XB, DW-XZ, GE-NN, HH-NN, NN-XB
NN-XZ
F 3 95.48 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-NN, DW-GE, DW-HH, DW-NN, DW-XB, DW-XZ, GE-HH, GE-NN, HH-NN, HH-XB, NN-XB,
NN-XZ
F 4 68.34 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-GE, DD-NN, DW-HH, DW-XB, DW-XZ, GE-HH, GE-XB, GE-XZ, HH-NN, NN-XB,
NN-XZ
ΔF 64.49 < 0.001 DD-DW, DD-GE, DD-NN, DW-HH, DW-XB, DW-XZ, GE-HH, GE-XB, GE-XZ, HH-NN, NN-XB, NN-XZ

*Adjusted significance level of 0.05/21 = 0.002