Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 27;2018:1723184. doi: 10.1155/2018/1723184

Table 2.

Subgroups analysis of combined HR for OS in HCC patients.

Subgroups NO. of studies NO. of patients Pooled HR P-value Heterogeneity
(95% CI) I2 (%) P-value Model
Sample size
<100 4 248 2.11 (1.29-3.46) 0.003 57.2 0.071 random
≥100 5 2128 2.13 (1.61-2.81) 0.000 51.4 0.084 random
Region
Asian 6 2146 1.93 (1.60-2.32) 0.000 0 0.646 random
Caucasian 3 230 2.67 (1.11-6.44) 0.029 85.9 0.001 random
Cutoff value
≤200 2 720 2.70 (0.97-7.50) 0.057 62.8 0.101 random
200-400 4 721 2.00 (1.56-2.57) 0.000 0 0.710 random
≥400 3 935 2.12 (1.14-3.94) 0.018 84.2 0.002 random
Tumor stage type
BCLC 4 780 2.11 (1.40-3.17) 0.000 77.8 0.004 random
TNM 2 1426 1.82 (1.39-2.38) 0.000 0 0.754 random
Others 3 170 2.73 (1.53-4.89) 0.001 20.6 0.284 random
Therapy method
resection 3 1189 1.95 (1.44-2.06) 0.000 29.7 0.241 random
TACE 2 152 4.22 (2.53-7.04) 0.000 0 0.817 random
others 4 1035 1.61 (1.35-1.93) 0.000 0 0.392 random

Notes: HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals; OS: overall survival; NO: number; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; TNM: Tumor Node Metastasis; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.