Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0209409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209409

Table 2. Comparison of the spatial algorithm with machine learning (SVM) for the classification of glaucoma.

Spatial algorithm SVM
Average AUROC [%] 98.3 82.4
Standard deviation AUROC [%] 3.1 2.3
Minimum AUROC [%] 85.1 76.1
Maximum AUROC [%] 99.7 88.0
Average sensitivity [%] 95.4 74.3
Average specificity [%] 94.2 79.3

We used 100 random splits of the ORIGA dataset (70% training, 30% testing). Both the spatial algorithm and SVM used the full pCDR, rather than the simple vertical vCDR alone. These data comes from semi-automated segmentation.