Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;117(11):2135–2145. doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-0171

Table 2. Summary of clinical evidence highlighting the association between cancer and the risk of venous thromboembolism based on the Khorana score.

Patient population Patients ( N ) Duration Rate of VTE, %
Low risk (score = 0) Medium risk (score = 1–2) High risk (score ≥ 3)
Retrospective studies
 Solid tumours or malignant lymphoma 23 112 2 y 5.0 15.9 41.4
 Any tumour type 24 932 NA 13.0 17.1 28.2
 Any advanced tumour type 25 1,415 2 mo 1.5 4.8 12.9
 Any tumour type 26 378 113 d 3.0 11.1
 Any tumour type 27 150 NA 1.9 3.9 9.1
 Any tumour type 28 2,782 1 y NA Score >2:
OR: 1.71 (95% CI: 1.16–2.59)
OR: 2.54 (95% CI: 1.29–5.03)
 Pancreatic tumours 29 108 NA NA 14.0 27.0
 Disseminated germ cell tumours 30 254 11 y NA NA OR: 11.8; p  < 0.001
Prospective studies
 Any tumour type 31 819 643 d 1.5 (95% CI: 0.6–3.9) Score = 1:
3.8 (95% CI: 1.9–7.4)
Score = 2:
9.6 (95% CI: 6.2–14.7)
17.7 (95% CI: 11.0–27.8)
 Any tumour type 32 1,097 3 mo NA NA OR: 3.5 (95% CI: 1–12.3)
 Any tumour type 33 35 3 mo NA NA 23.0
 Any tumour type 34 580 3 mo 4.0 NA Score ≥ 2: 11.0
 Any tumour type 35 1,685 2 y Score = 1:
HR = 3.23 (95% CI: 1.53–6.81)
p  = 0.002;
Score = 2:
HR = 4.63 (95% CI: 2.20–9.75)
p  < 0.001
HR = 6.47 (95% CI: 2.99–14.00)
p  < 0.001
Pooled analysis
 Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 36 1,717 NA 2.2 (95% CI: NA) 4.5 (95% CI: 2.3–6.7) 6.6 (95% CI: 2.4–10.8)
p  = 0.012

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Source: Adapted from Angelini et al. 37