Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;12(3):550–560. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.12.007

Table 5.

Univariate Analysis of Candidate Genes

Candidate Gene Expression n Median Survival (mos) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value Survival Median LDFS
(mos)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value LDFS
LUM
 Low 28 50 0.64 .19 51 0.55 .10
 High 27 32 (0.30-1.28) 20 (0.24-1.14)
TIMP1
 Low 28 57 0.60 .14 51 0.51 .07
 High 28 31 (0.29-1.19) 20 (0.23-1.06)
BHLHB2
 Low 28 57 0.59 .13 NR 0.55 .11
 High 28 31 (0.28-1.17) 27 (0.26-1.16)
FN1
 Low 28 57 0.63 .18 46 0.80 .54
 High 28 31 (0.30-1.26) 27 (0.37-1.69)
TM4SF1
 Low 28 42 0.90 .77 46 0.94 .86
 High 28 31 (0.44-1.83) 27 (0.44-1.99)
Mig-6
 Low 28 67 0.42 .01 NR 0.55 .10
 High 28 29 (0.18-0.80) 20 (0.24-1.12)
SER2
 Low 28 42 0.79 .50 46 0.76 .47
 High 27 31 (0.38-1.61) 20 (0.35-1.62)

Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on colorectal liver metastases from 56 additional patients that underwent hepatectomy. Patients above and below the median expression level were compared by log-rank testing.