Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 4;9:1138. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01138

Table 2.

The number of records, covert and overt saccades with light target and in darkness for each BVL patient.

Patient Visible target Darkness Differences of saccade rate per record
Records Covert saccades Overt saccades Records Covert saccades Overt saccades Covert saccades Overt saccades All CUS
1 21 25 27 21 13 10 48% 63% 56%
2 24 24 38 21 1 3 95% 91% 93%
3 21 16 19 20 2 11 87% 39% 61%
4 19 12 12 22 2 9 86% 35% 60%
5 19 23 13 13 6 7 62% 21% 47%
6 19 17 20 19 2 12 88% 40% 62%
7 20 10 13 19 1 4 89% 68% 77%
8 19 25 15 22 7 8 76% 54% 68%
9 22 11 21 19 16 0 −68% 100% 42%
10 19 23 23 15 10 0 45% 100% 72%
11 17 22 11 17 9 8 59% 27% 48%
12 19 29 15 16 16 0 34% 100% 57%
13 14 10 11 15 8 1 25% 92% 60%
14 18 18 24 20 8 12 60% 55% 57%
15 20 15 11 24 5 2 72% 85% 78%
16 19 20 28 18 20 1 −6% 96% 54%
17 20 20 13 19 19 8 0% 35% 14%
Mean : 50% 65% 59%

The difference of saccade rate per record in light and darkness is expressed in %. The mean difference of saccade rate per record for the whole group is 50% for covert saccades, 65% for overt saccades and 59 % for all CUS.