Table 2.
Performance by CN and MCI participants on the Harvard APT, CFAB, ADCS ADL-PI, and SSPP-IADL
| CN | MCI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard APT | APT-Script | Adjusted time | 66.4 ± 20.9 | 75.3 ± 38.4 |
| APT-PCP | Adjusted time | 226.0 ± 117.8 | 346.2 ± 141.3 | |
| CFAB | CFAB-Script | Time | 222.8 ± 88.8 | 246.7 ± 107.0 |
| Rate | 0.054 ± 0.019 | 0.044 ± 0.023 | ||
| CFAB-ATM | Time | 279.4 ± 123.5 | 309.1 ± 188.6 | |
| Rate | 0.041 ± 0.017 | 0.034 ± 0.020 | ||
| ADCS ADL-PI | Participant-report | 1.17 ± 0.16 | 1.22 ± 0.23 | |
| Study partner-report | 1.09 ± 0.14 | 1.39 ± 0.31 | ||
| SSPP-IADL | Participant-report | 0.31 ± 0.37 | 0.77 ± 0.53 | |
| Study partner-report | 0.31 ± 0.50 | 0.89 ± 0.98 | ||
Values represent mean ± standard deviation
ADCS ADL-PI Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living prevention instrument, APT Automated Phone Task, ATM automated teller machine, CFAB Czaja Functional Assessment Battery, CN clinically normal, MCI mild cognitive impairment, PCP primary care physician, SSPP-IADL Subjective Study Partner and Participant-reported instrumental activities of daily living