Table 5.
Comparative analysis of AITL patients based on the remission status at the time of allo-HCT
CR1 (N = 33) | CR > 1 (N = 75) | PR (N = 90) | Refractory (N = 38) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcomes | N | Prob (95% CI) | N | Prob (95% CI) | N | Prob (95% CI) | N | Prob (95% CI) |
NRM | 33 | 75 | 90 | 38 | ||||
1-year | 6 (1–17)% | 20 (12–30)% | 20 (13–29)% | 24 (12–38)% | ||||
2-year | 13 (4–26)% | 29 (19–40)% | 25 (17–35)% | 30 (16–45)% | ||||
3-year | 17 (6–32)% | 31 (21–43)% | 25 (17–35)% | 30 (16–45)% | ||||
4-year | 17 (6–32)% | 36 (25–49)% | 33 (22–44)% | 30 (16–45)% | ||||
Progression/ relapse | 33 | 75 | 90 | 38 | ||||
1-year | 15 (5–29)% | 13 (7–22)% | 14 (7–21)% | 29 (16–44)% | ||||
2-year | 25 (12–41)% | 16 (9–26)% | 19 (11–28)% | 29 (16–44)% | ||||
3-year | 25 (12–41)% | 18 (10–28)% | 19 (11–28)% | 32 (18–48)% | ||||
4-year | 25 (12–41)% | 18 (10–28)% | 21 (12–30)% | 32 (18–48)% | ||||
PFS | 33 | 75 | 90 | 38 | ||||
1-year | 79 (63–91)% | 67 (56–77)% | 66 (56–76)% | 47 (32–63)% | ||||
2-year | 62 (45–78)% | 54 (43–66)% | 56 (45–66)% | 41 (26–57)% | ||||
3-year | 58 (41–75)% | 50 (38–62)% | 56 (45–66)% | 38 (23–54)% | ||||
4-year | 58 (41–75)% | 45 (33–58)% | 47 (36–58)% | 38 (23–54)% | ||||
Overall survival | 33 | 75 | 90 | 38 | ||||
1-year | 88 (75–97)% | 73 (63–83)% | 71 (61–80)% | 63 (47–78)% | ||||
2-year | 78 (62–90)% | 62 (51–73)% | 59 (48–69)% | 52 (36–67)% | ||||
3-year | 70 (52–85)% | 58 (46–70)% | 57 (47–68)% | 52 (36–67)% | ||||
4-year | 70 (52–85)% | 54 (41–66)% | 50 (39–62)% | 52 (36–67)% |
CR complete response, PR partial response, Prob probability, CI confidence interval, N number, NRM non-relapse mortality, PFS progression-free survival