Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan;60(1):134–146. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24878

Table 3.

Results of 2-Way ANOVA in Plasma Samples

miR
P
Fold Change
Cohort 1
Cohort 2
hsa-miR-4667-5p 4.1E-05 2.55 1.72
hsa-miR-99b-3p 4.8E-05 3.17 2.02
hsa-miR-637 5.1E-05 2.53 2.37
hsa-miR-4490 5.7E-05 4.19 1.88
hsa-miR-1253 6.0E-05 3.58 1.93
hsa-miR-3190-3p 3.1E-04 3.08 1.69
hsa-miR-3173-3p 0.001 3.68 1.98
hsa-miR-608 0.001 3.07 1.89
hsa-miR-4725-3p 0.002 4.69 1.57
hsa-miR-4448 0.002 2.08 1.96
hsa-miR-323b-5p 0.002 4.88 1.72
hsa-miR-4538 0.003 3.24 2.09
hsa-miR-3913-3p 0.003 1.70 1.67
hsa-miR-3159 0.003 2.31 1.62
hsa-miR-4663 0.003 2.39 2.19
hsa-miR-4767 0.003 1.81 1.67
hsa-miR-4724-5p 0.003 2.46 1.54
hsa-miR-1306-5p 0.003 1.34 2.55
hsa-miR-181b-3p 0.004 1.92 1.80
hsa-miR-433-3p 0.004 3.02 1.56

ANOVA P values are reported for disease state (glaucoma/XFS versus cataract controls). These P values all met threshold significance after adjustment for false discovery rate using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Fold change is 2-ΔCT of glaucoma versus cataracts for each cohort.