Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 4;9:2899. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02899

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Distinct phenotypic profile of CCR9+ Th cells in the inflamed GIT. Flow cytometric analyses showing representative FACS dot plots of surface marker expression for CCR9+ and CCR9− CD44hi CD4+ T cells from the mesenteric lymph nodes and quantitation of the percentages of CCR9+ and CCR9− CD44hi CCD4+ T cells from Il2−/− and WT mice. CCR6; (A) representative FACS dot plot and (B) quantitation. a4b7; (C) representative FACS dot plot and (D) quantitation. IL9R; (E) representative FACS dot plot and (F) quantitation. CD122; (G) representative FACS dot plot and (H) quantitation. CD127; (I) representative FACS dot plot and (J) quantitation. CXCR5; (K) representative FACS dot plot and (L) quantitation. PD1; (M) representative FACS dot plot and (N) quantitation. (MLN) mesenteric lymph nodes; (PP) Peyer's Patches; (SI IEL) intraepithelial lymphocytes of the small intestine; (SI LPL) lamina propria lymphocytes of the small intestine; (LI IEL) intraepithelial lymphocytes of the large intestine; (LI LPL) lamina propria lymphocytes of the large intestine. Data shown as mean + SD, where n = 3-9 female mice at 7-9 weeks of age. Statistical significance was assessed by students T-test.