Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Stat Mech. 2018 Mar 20;2018:033406. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/aab04e

FIG. 2. Comparison of numerical simulations with theory.

FIG. 2.

Ecosystems were simulated with the consumption coefficients c = 0, 1 drawn from a Bernoulli distribution with probability p (black lines) or a Gaussian distribution with same mean and variance as the binomial distribution (red line). Here S = M = 30, K = 1, σk = 1, m = 1, σm = .1, and 250 trials were used in these simulations: the error bars denote ±2 standard deviations. The Ka and mi were drawn iid from a gamma distribution in the binomial plot to ensure nonnegativity of the parameters, and a Gaussian distribution in the Gaussian approximation plot. The numerical results were compared to theoretical predictions from the self-consistent cavity equations for ecologically stable steady-states (green circles). (A) Fraction of species that survive ϕN , (B) fraction of resources that are not depleted ϕR, (C) average abundance of all species 〈N〉, (D) average abundance of all resources 〈R〉 as a function of the probability p. (E) Mean-abundance of surviving species 〈N〉/ϕN and (F) mean-abundance of surviving resources 〈R〉/R.