Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 26;176(3):466–477. doi: 10.1111/bph.14548

Table 1.

Statistical analysis of the correlation between activities of flucloxacillin (FLX) hydroxylation and isoenzyme specific reactions catalysed by HLM from 16 different donors

Isoenzyme‐specific reaction CYP 10 μM FLX 100 μM FLX
Pearson's r P‐value Pearson's r P‐value
Phenacetin O‐deethylation CYP1A2 0.04 0.87 0.10 0.70
Coumarin 7‐hydroxylation CYP2A6 0.45 0.078 0.45 0.093
Buproprion hydroxylation CYP2B6 0.16 0.54 0.49 0.16
Amodiaquine N‐deethylation CYP2C8 0.50 0.051 0.044 0.87
Diclofenac 4′‐hydroxylation CYP2C9 0.78 0.0004 0.58 0.019
Mephenytoin 4′‐hydroxylation CYP2C19 0.45 0.079 −0.059 0.83
Bufuralol 1‐hydroxylation CYP2D6 0.15 0.59 −0.069 0.80
Chlorzoxazone 6‐hydroxylation CYP2E1 0.42 0.10 0.36 0.17
Midazolam 1′‐hydroxylation CYP3A4 0.58 0.012 0.48 0.061
Testosterone 6β‐hydroxylation CYP3A4 0.69 0.003 0.39 0.14