Table 1.
Statistical analysis of the correlation between activities of flucloxacillin (FLX) hydroxylation and isoenzyme specific reactions catalysed by HLM from 16 different donors
Isoenzyme‐specific reaction | CYP | 10 μM FLX | 100 μM FLX | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pearson's r | P‐value | Pearson's r | P‐value | ||
Phenacetin O‐deethylation | CYP1A2 | 0.04 | 0.87 | 0.10 | 0.70 |
Coumarin 7‐hydroxylation | CYP2A6 | 0.45 | 0.078 | 0.45 | 0.093 |
Buproprion hydroxylation | CYP2B6 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.16 |
Amodiaquine N‐deethylation | CYP2C8 | 0.50 | 0.051 | 0.044 | 0.87 |
Diclofenac 4′‐hydroxylation | CYP2C9 | 0.78 | 0.0004 | 0.58 | 0.019 |
Mephenytoin 4′‐hydroxylation | CYP2C19 | 0.45 | 0.079 | −0.059 | 0.83 |
Bufuralol 1‐hydroxylation | CYP2D6 | 0.15 | 0.59 | −0.069 | 0.80 |
Chlorzoxazone 6‐hydroxylation | CYP2E1 | 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.17 |
Midazolam 1′‐hydroxylation | CYP3A4 | 0.58 | 0.012 | 0.48 | 0.061 |
Testosterone 6β‐hydroxylation | CYP3A4 | 0.69 | 0.003 | 0.39 | 0.14 |