Table 4.

Unadjusted IMAT and VAT volumes, and adjusted probability of having diabetes according to the crossing of IMAT with VAT in sex specific quartiles 1–3 (Q1–3) vs quartile 4 (Q4). The 495 people in quartile 1 for both IMAT and VAT were much thinner (mean±std IMAT 0.87±0.26 cc and VAT 50.43±19.61 cc; 4.6% had diabetes) and were omitted to improve comparison of diabetes probabilities according to fatness.

	IMAT Q1–3		IMAT Q4
	IMAT Values
	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean
VAT Q1–3	1009	1.97 (0.46)	302	4.09 (1.25)
VAT Q4	301	2.28 (0.45)	471	4.97 (1.96)
	VAT Values
VAT Q1–3	1009	120.02 (31.46)	302	136.98 (30.05)
VAT Q4	301	214.29 (46.6)	471	240.42 (66.18)
	Diabetes probability in Multinomial Logistic Model 2 (see definitions in Table 3)
VAT Q1–3	1009	0.090	302	0.133
VAT Q4	301	0.171	471	0.236