Skip to main content
. 2018 May 17;40(2):216–221. doi: 10.1038/s41401-018-0018-6

Table 3.

The characteristics of the 87 subjects assayed with ELISA

Variable NC FH PH P
n (male/female) 15/21 15/7 16/13 0.139
Age (years) 49.6 ± 10.5 50.3 ± 8.6 51.9 ± 9.4 0.616
BMI (kg/m2) 25.0 ± 2.6 25.9 ± 3.6 25.5 ± 3.3 0.588
HbA1c (%) 5.7 ± 0.4 6.2 ± 0.5* 6.2 ± 0.6* <0.001
FPG (mmol/L) 5.5 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 0.5* 6.0 ± 0.6*† <0.001
2-h PG (mmol/L) 8.2 ± 1.8 8.7 ± 2.1 12.8 ± 1.3*† <0.001
FINS (mU/L) 9.9 ± 3.0 12.9 ± 7.7 10.4 ± 4.3 0.076
2-h INS (mU/L) 93.2 ± 41.9 95.6 ± 66.8 100.5 ± 57.3 0.863
HOMA-B 103.1 ± 40.0 69.2 ± 41.3* 89.6 ± 44.1 0.014
HOMA-IR 2.4 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 2.5* 2.8 ± 1.2 <0.001
Cederholm index 43.7 ± 11.3 40.1 ± 12.2 28.6 ± 5.0*† <0.001
Mannose (pg/ml) 409.2 ± 108.5 466.0 ± 179.3 390.1 ± 140.2 0.130
AICAR (pg/ml) 372.8 ± 90.9 523.5 ± 164.8* 512.1 ± 186.0* <0.001

NC normal control, FH fasting hyperglycemia, PH post-load hyperglycemia, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, 2-h PG 2-h plasma glucose, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, FINS fasting insulin, 2-h INS 2-h insulin, HOMA-IR the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-B the homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function

*P  <  0.05 compared with NC after Bonferroni correction

P  <  0.05 compared with FH after Bonferroni correction