Table 5.
Adverse psychosocial exposures and product terms |
Model 1: Two-way product term (V × D) |
Model 2: Two-way product term (V × A) |
Model 3: Two-way product term (D × A) |
Model 4: Two-way product terms alone |
Model 5: All two- and three-way product terms |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (95% CI), p value | b (95% CI), p value | b (95% CI), p value | b (95% CI), p value | b (95% CI), p value | |
Violence victimisation (V) x Drug use (D) | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.09), p = .42 | 0.01 (−0.05, 0.07), p = .67 | −0.05 (−0.14, 0.03), p = .21 | ||
V × A | 0.05 (0.002, 0.107), p = .04 | 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09), p = .11 | 0.01 (−0.04, 0.08), p = .56 | ||
D × A | 0.06 (0.007, 0.129), p = .02 | 0.05 (−.008, 0.11), p = .08 | −0.01 (−0.10, 0.07), p = .69 | ||
V × D × A | 0.14 (0.01, 0.27), p = .03 |
Note. 1) The models were adjusted for covariates such as age, education, marital status, sexual identity, forced sex experience during adolescence, HIV risk perception, HIV knowledge, social support and HIV programme exposure. 2) The estimates of the main effects are not shown, and ‘b’ represents the estimated regression coefficient on the product term (use to assess additive interaction).