Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002626. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002626

Table 4.

Risk of repeat revascularization in anatomic subgroups

Variables No. of Patients No. of Events Event Rate (K-M estimate) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value P-value for interaction
3 Diseased Vessels 0.01*
With or without proximal LAD artery
EES 773 202 32.8 3.30(2.43,4.49) <0.0001
CABG 773 79 13.6 Reference
With proximal LAD artery 0.31
EES 278 65 30.2 2.67(1.62,4.40) 0.0001
CABG 278 33 16.4 Reference
Without proximal LAD artery
EES 495 137 34.2 3.72(2.52,5.49) <0.0001
CABG 495 46 12.1 Reference
2 Diseased Vessels
With or without proximal LAD artery
EES 1008 213 28.0 1.92(1.49,2.48) <0.0001
CABG 1008 115 14.8 Reference
With proximal LAD artery 1.44(0.86,2.40) 0.16 0.21
EES 250 50 29.7
CABG 250 29 149 Reference
Without proximal LAD artery
EES 758 163 26.9 2.11(1.57,2.84) <0.0001
CABG 758 86 14.9 Reference
Complete Revascularization 0.005
EES 748 120 23.3 1.56(1.12,2.16) 0.01
CABG 748 76 13.0 Reference
Incomplete Revascularizationϯ
EES 3300 769 29.8 2.62(2.26,3.03) <0.0001
CABG 3300 345 13.6 Reference
*

Test for interaction for the number of diseased vessels (3 diseased vessels vs. 2 diseased vessels);

Test for interaction based on the proximal LAD disease status (with vs. without proximal LAD).

Test for interaction based on completeness of revascularization (complete vs. incomplete) in the PCI cohort.

ϯ

Based on incomplete revascularization in the PCI group. CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery; EES = everolimus eluting stent; LAD = left anterior descending artery.