Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 18;43(1):102–111. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22168

Table IV.

Reported genome-wide significance SNPs from traditional GWAS with critical value of 5×10−8 of the PLP trait in the TSS from Carter et al. [2015] and ComPaSS-GWAS selected SNPs.

SNP Chr Mb MAF GWAS
p-value
ComPaSS-GWAS Score ALPL Association reported prior to Carter et al. [2015]
α = 1×10−3 α = 1×10−4
rs1780324 1 21.694 0.49 1.3×10−11 0.95 0.84* Intergenic Yuan et al. [2008]
rs1697421 1 21.696 0.49 3.5×10−11 0.94 0.77* Intergenic Keene et al. [2014]
rs1780321 1 21.697 0.33 2.8×10−12 0.98 0.87* Intergenic
rs4021228 1 21.736 0.47 4.8×10−9 0.83 0.33 Intronic
rs1780316 1 21.762 0.07 8.7×10−9 0.72 0.16 Exonic Keene et al. [2014]
rs1256335 1 21.763 0.22 5.0×10−14 1.00 0.98* Intronic Harza et al. [2009]
rs2275370 1 21.773 0.21 1.8×10−9 0.78 0.33 Intronic
rs1772719 1 21.777 0.23 2.5×10−16 1.00 1.00* UTR3
rs1772720 1 21.778 0.08 8.8×10−10 0.86 0.46 Downstream

selected for ComPaSS-GWAS parameter set α = 1×10−3 and η = 0.6

*

selected for ComPaSS-GWAS parameter set α = 1×10−4 and η = 0.5