Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;53(5):426–441. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay055

Table 2.

Conscientiousness as a moderator of neuroticism and childhood neuroticism

Outcome Adulthood predictors Childhood predictors
Neur Con Neur x Con Neur Con Neur x Con
Est [95% CI] Est [95% CI] Est [95% CI] p Est [95% CI] Est [95% CI] Est [95% CI] p
Self-rated health −0.54
[−0.70, −0.38]
0.13
[−0.06, 0.32]
0.11
[−0.17, 0.38]
.451 −0.08
[−0.16, −0.01]
0.03
[−0.04, 0.11]
−0.01
[−0.08, 0.06]
.865
Heart condition 0.23
[−0.31, 0.75]
0.08
[−0.55, 0.72]
0.80
[−0.22, 1.95]
.149 −0.01
[−0.24, 0.22]
0.05
[−0.19, 0.30]
0.10
[−0.12, 0.31]
.353
Number chronic illnesses 0.23
[0.02, 0.43]
−0.05
[−0.29, 0.20]
−0.02
[−0.37, 0.35]
.927 0.07
[−0.02, 0.16]
−0.07
[−0.16, 0.03]
0.02
[−0.06, 0.11]
.619
Ever smoked 0.17
[−0.17, 0.52]
−0.18
[−0.60, 0.23]
0.04
[−0.57, 0.65]
.899 0.08
[−0.07, 0.23]
−0.32
[−0.49, −0.16]
−0.02
[−0.17, 0.12]
.751
Number cigarettes (count model) 0.05
[−0.35, 0.46]
−0.05
[−0.56, 0.45]
0.57
[−0.31, 1.44]
.203 −0.10
[−0.27, 0.07]
−0.02
[−0.17, 0.14]
−0.08
[−0.23, 0.08]
.323
Number cigarettes
(zero model)
−0.61
[−1.16, −0.05]
0.06
[−0.62, 0.75]
0.22
[−0.90, 1.34]
.695 −0.13
[−0.37, 0.11]
0.23
[−0.01, 0.47]
0.01
[−0.22, 0.24]
.916
Ever drank 0.43
[−0.07, 0.96]
0.05
[−0.56, 0.66]
0.42
[−0.45, 1.22]
.328 −0.09
[−0.30, 0.12]
0.06
[−0.18, 0.28]
−0.14
[−0.33, 0.05]
.143
Alcohol (days per week) (count model) −0.04
[−0.18, 010]
−0.17
[−0.35, 0.01]
0.20
[−0.07, 0.46]
.147 −0.01
[−0.05, 0.07]
−0.03
[−0.09, 0.04]
−0.04
[−0.10, 0.02]
.212
Alcohol (days per week)
(zero model)
0.04
[−0.34, 0.43]
−0.24
[−0.72, 0.23]
0.38
[−0.36, 1.11]
.315 0.04
[−0.13, 0.20]
−0.01
[−0.19, 0.17]
0.06
[−0.10, 0.22]
.452
Alcohol (drinks per sitting)
(count model)
0.12
[−0.06, 0.30]
−0.17
[−0.40, 0.06]
0.26
[−0.09, 0.61]
.141 0.03
[−0.05, 0.10]
−0.07
[−0.16, 0.01]
−0.06
[−0.14, 0.02]
.115
Alcohol (drinks per sitting) (zero model) −0.04
[−0.18, 0.10]
−0.17
[−0.35, 0.01]
0.20
[−0.07, 0.46]
.119 0.01
[−0.05, 0.07]
−0.03
[−0.09, 0.04]
−0.04
[−0.10, 0.02]
.815
Alcohol (binge per week)
(count model)
0.26
[0.02, 0.50]
−0.28
[−0.61, 0.05]
1.51*
[0.73, 2.29]
< .001 −0.09
[−0.20, 0.03]
−0.11
[−0.22, 0.01]
−0.11
[−0.22, 0.01]
.072
Alcohol (binge per week)
(zero model)
−0.09
[−0.60, 0.42]
0.15
[−0.45, 0.75]
0.27
[−0.87, 1.41]
.643 −0.12
[−0.33, 0.09]
0.12
[−0.10, 0.34]
0.01
[−0.11, 0.31]
.358
Exercise (strenuous) −0.05
[−0.18, 0.07]
0.11
[−0.04, 0.27]
−0.04
[−0.23, 0.17]
.700 −0.01
[−0.06, 0.04]
−0.02
[−0.07, 0.04]
0.02
[−0.03, 0.07]
.403
Exercise (moderate) −0.09
[−0.27, 0.08]
0.00
[−0.20, 0.21]
0.12
[−0.15, 0.39]
.389 −0.03
[−0.10, 0.05]
−0.05
[−0.13, 0.02]
0.01
[−0.06, 0.07]
.856
Exercise (mild) −0.01
[−0.19, 0.16]
0.19
[−0.02, 0.39]
0.08
[−0.20, 0.35]
.584 0.00
[−0.07, 0.07]
−0.06
[−0.13, 0.02]
−0.01
[−0.07, 0.06]
.859
Flossing 0.05
[−0.12, 0.22]
−0.11
[−0.31, 0.09]
−0.16
[−0.42, 0.11]
.254 −0.02
[−0.10, 0.05]
−0.05
[−0.12, 0.03]
−0.02
[−0.09, 0.04]
.527
Blood glucose levels 0.08
[−0.08, 0.24]
−0.12
[−0.32, 0.07]
−0.04
[−0.32, 0.24]
.785 −0.02
[−0.10, 0.05]
−0.08
[−0.16, −0.01]
0.00
[−0.07, 0.07]
.919
Cholesterol/HDL ratio 0.00
[−0.18, 0.17]
−0.06
[−0.28, 0.15]
0.09
[−0.23, 0.40]
.587 −0.02
[-0.09, 0.05]
−0.11
[−0.18, −0.04]
0.02
[−0.04, 0.09]
.521
Systolic blood pressure 0.10
[−0.06, 0.26]
0.16
[−0.03, 0.36]
0.24
[−0.04, 0.52]
.087 0.05
[−0.02, 0.12]
−0.03
[−0.10, 0.04]
−0.01
[−0.07, 0.06]
.778
Waist to hip ratio 0.15
[0.01, 0.28]
−0.05
[−0.21, 0.11]
0.01
[−0.21, 0.24]
.901 0.01
[−0.05, 0.06]
−0.10
[−0.15, −0.04]
0.06*
[0.01, 0.10]
.025

Neuroticism, childhood neuroticism, and moderators are all standardized, allowing for easier interpretation of the simple slopes. Regression coefficients (standardized when the outcome is continuous and the model is estimated using ordinary least squares) and 95% confidence intervals are presented. All models control for gender and age at outcome measurement.

*Indicates p < .05. Stars are only used indicate significant interaction terms; we do not interpret significance of the simple slopes (e.g., the coefficients for neuroticism and conscientiousness) because they are dependent upon the level of the other predictor and only included to allow for better interpretation of the interaction. Exact p-values for the interaction terms are presented to allow for estimation of the evidentiary value of these findings.