Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;8:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.010

Table 3.

Eggs per gram (EPG), faecal egg count reduction (FECR) and buffaloes positive by coprology reduction (BPCR).

Days EPG ± SD
FECR% (day 21)
FECR% (day 28)
BPCR (%)
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
Methods
Methods
0 7 14 21 28 1 2 3 1 2 3
Group1 106.21 ± 41.19 42.34 ± 22.19 3.33 ± 8.77 1.53 ± 5.14 0.28 ± 1.67 98.56 98.56 98.55 99.73 99.74 99.73 97.03
Group 2 100.89 ± 45.46 27.69 ± 20.91 17.45 ± 17.72 1.39 ± 3.04 1.63 ± 3.87 98.69 98.62 98.61 98.46 98.38 98.37 77.66
Group 3 106.74 ± 41.02 101.69 ± 24.23 96.85 ± 20.50 107.14 ± 23.04 106.02 ± 17.76

The mean EPG of buffaloes from each group was counted at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after treatment. FECR% were calculated at days 21 and 28 by the three methods (Method 1 was the WAAVP method; Method 2 calculated individual buffalo reductions followed by transformation and averaging; Method 3 accounted for changes in control values over time and used group means).

Significant differences of EPG between pre-treatment and post-treatment in each group were determined using the Mann-Whitney test.

* = Significant at the 5% level (P < 0.05).