Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;10(1):80–85. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00461

Table 1. Impact of Covalent Reactive Group Selection on Compound Pharmacologya.

graphic file with name ml-2018-00461c_0003.jpg

        IC50c (nM)
kinact/Kid (1/(M·s))
   
compd X Y ωb BTK WT BTK C481S EGFR SRC BTK WTe EGFRf BTK T1/2e,g (h) THLE IC50 (μM)
1     0.83 0.1 3.4 18 38 226 000 45 040 >24 11
9a     0.44 1.5 43 16 800 1 630 123 900 56 6 137
9b H H 0.83 0.25 17 26 4 030 206 500 25 110 >24 15
9c CH3 H 0.48 247 176 >20 000 3 350 <1h i i i
9d H CH3 0.60 61 66 >20 000 3 410 4 910 i >24 149
9e F H 0.69 5.3 170 570 6 480 35 300 435 >24 67
9f H CH2OH 0.61 2.3 33 2 910 4 610 26 650 213 >24 43
9g H CH2F 0.65 2.7 90 2 180 3 140 85 770 332 >24 49
9h H CHF2 0.81 0.41 115 274 5 840 80 500 i >24 8
9i H CH2NMe2 0.59 3.7 65 149 370 19 180 514 >24 15
a

All values are the mean of two or more independent assays.

b

Electrophilicity index calculated using DMol3 at PBE/TNP/COSMO level of theory in water with LowModeMD.

c

Lanthascreen assay, [ATP] = Km.

d

For reversible inhibitors, the analogous second-order rate constant is given.

e

TR-FRET binding assay.

f

Caliper enzymatic assay.

g

Apparent dissociation rate.

h

Kinetics consistent with reversible inhibition; time dependence not observed.

i

Not determined.