Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Gerontol. 2018 Nov 8;115:155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.11.003

Table 4:

In vitro soleus muscle contractile properties of skmERαWT and skmERαKO mice in study 2.

Groups Two-way ANOVA p-values
skmERαWT–Sed (n=6) skmERαKO–Sed (n=5) skmERαWT–Run (n=11) skmERαKO–Run (n=10) Genotype Activity Interaction
Muscle mass (mg) 8.22 ± 1.21 10.4 ± 0.95 10.7 ± 0.71 11.8 ± 1.53 0.003 <0.001 0.283
Muscle length (mm) 10.5 ± 0.54 10.7 ± 0.69 10.3 ± 0.49 10.2 ± 0.35 0.638 0.114 0.433
Physiological CSA (mm2) 1.07 ± 0.13 1.29 ± 0.10 1.38 ± 0.11 1.54 ± 0.22 0.006 <0.001 0.835
Peak twitch force (mN) 28.4 ± 6.22 29.4 ± 6.18 22.1 ± 5.09 23.1 ± 7.03 0.691 0.019 0.991
Peak isometric tetanic force (mN) 220 ± 40.1 221 ± 17.1 202 ± 38.3 192 ± 46.9 0.641 0.172 0.763
Active stiffness (N/m) 421 ± 91.3 448±103 391 ±108 370 ±102 0.942 0.197 0.563
Passive stiffness (N/m) 13.0 ± 1.77 13.3 ± 0.97 15.3 ± 2.43 15.4 ± 1.73 0.841 0.008 0.907

Data are mean ± SD.