Table 3.
FUH-7 Performance1 | FUH-30 Performance2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef. | SE | z (p-value) | Coef. | SE | p-value | |
Hospital-Level Characteristics | ||||||
Electronic Health Records | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.18 (0.858) | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.91(0.365) |
Health Information Exchanges | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.64 (0.521) | −0.005 | 0.008 | −0.55(0.583) |
HBIPS-7 Performance Rate | −0.008 | 0.015 | −0.51 (0.610) | −0.030 | 0.018 | −1.76(0.078) |
Patients Eligible for FUH per 1,000 | −0.014 | 0.029 | −0.44 (0.657) | −0.020 | 0.031 | −0.71(0.476) |
Academic Medical Center | 0.010 | 0.007 | 1.29 (0.198) | 0.010 | 0.008 | 1.28 (0.201) |
System-Affiliated | −0.010 | 0.007 | −1.24 (0.214) | −0.017 | 0.008 | −2.08 (0.038) |
Psychiatric Specialty Hospital | −0.010 | 0.009 | −1.02 (0.307) | −0.029 | 0.009 | −3.02 (0.002) |
Bed Size | ||||||
Small (Less than 100 Beds) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Medium (100–399 Beds) | −0.015 | 0.009 | −1.56 (0.119) | −0.029 | 0.010 | −2.96 (0.003) |
Large (More than 399 Beds) | −0.017 | 0.009 | −1.34 (0.180) | −0.044 | 0.015 | −3.30 (0.001) |
Type | ||||||
Non-profit | Reference | Reference | ||||
Public | −0.038 | 0.011 | −3.71 (<0.001) | −0.040 | 0.010 | −3.95 (<0.001) |
For-profit | −0.014 | 0.010 | −1.37 (0.169) | −0.018 | 0.010 | −1.85 (0.064) |
Community-Level Characteristics | ||||||
Percent Hispanic Residents1 | −0.063 | 0.025 | −2.55 (0.011) | −0.048 | 0.028 | −1.75 (0.080) |
Percent Nonwhite Residents2 | −0.059 | 0.025 | −2.64 (0.008) | −0.075 | 0.018 | −3.75 (<0.001) |
Percent Below FPL Residents | −0.004 | 0.045 | −0.09 (0.930) | −0.047 | 0.037 | −1.32 (0.187) |
Rural | −0.001 | 0.029 | 0 (0.996) | −0.0005 | 0.021 | 0 (0.998) |
State fixed effect | Controlled | Controlled |
Number of observations = 1,053; number of replications = 392; Wald chi2(64) = 2438.68; Rsquared = 0.2865; Adj R-squared = 0.2402
Number of observations = 1,244; number of replications = 526; Wald chi2 (64) = 1495.03; Rsquared = 0.3400; Adj R-squared = 0.3041
Note 3: The z test and p values were calculated from the linear regression coefficients and bootstrap standard errors.
Note 4: P Values of less than 0.0038 are determined to be significant based on Bonferroni adjustment Note 5: Different model specifications have been tested. Results are available upon request.