Table 4.
FUH-7 Performance | FUH-30 Performance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR | z (p-value) | 95% CI | AOR | z (p-value) | 95% CI | |
Hospital-Level Characteristics | ||||||
Electronic Health Records | 0.72 | −1.41 (0.158) | 0.45–1.37 | 1.26 | 1.08 (0.280) | 0.83–1.93 |
Health Information Exchanges | 1.31 | 1.33 (0.185) | 0.88–1.96 | 0.89 | −0.56 (0.574) | 0.61–1.32 |
HBIPS-7 Measure Performance | ||||||
Low (<77%) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Moderate (77%-97%) | 0.93 | −0.36 (0.716) | 0.63–1.37 | 0.91 | −0.56 (0.575) | 0.65–1.27 |
High (>97%) | 1.24 | 0.82 (0.419) | 0.75–2.05 | 0.83 | −0.96 (0.338) | 0.57–1.21 |
Number of Patients Eligible for FUH | ||||||
Low (FUH-7, <71; FUH-30, <55) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Mod (FUH-7, 71–193; FUH-30, 55–175) | 0.76 | −1.57 (0.117) | 0.53–1.07 | 1.00 | 0.02 (0.983) | 0.69–1.46 |
High (FUH-7, >193; FUH-30, >175) | 0.63 | −1.95 (0.051) | 0.39–1.00 | 0.69 | −1.46 (0.143) | 0.44–1.10 |
Academic Medical Center | 1.15 | 0.86 (0.389) | 0.84–1.56 | 1.47 | 2.12 (0.034) | 1.03–2.10 |
System-Affiliated | 0.63 | −2.47 (0.014) | 0.44–0.91 | 0.58 | −3.86 (<0.001) | 0.44–0.77 |
Psychiatric Specialty Hospital | 0.80 | −0.96 (0.339) | 0.50–1.27 | 0.60 | −2.06 (0.039) | 0.37–0.98 |
Bed Size | ||||||
Small (Less than 100 Beds) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Medium (100–399 Beds) | 0.82 | −1.05 (0.295) | 0.57–1.19 | 0.67 | −2.02 (0.043) | 0.46–0.99 |
Large (More than 399 Beds) | 0.78 | −0.86 (0.392) | 0.44–1.38 | 0.51 | −2.18 (0.030) | 0.27–0.93 |
Ownership | ||||||
Non-profit | Reference | Reference | ||||
Public | 0.36 | −3.60 (<0.001) | 0.21–0.63 | 0.38 | −4.12 (<0.001) | 0.24–0.60 |
For-profit | 0.56 | −2.78 (0.005) | 0.37–0.84 | 0.47 | −3.51 (<0.001) | 0.31–0.72 |
Community-Level Characteristics | ||||||
Percent Hispanic Residents1 | ||||||
Low (<2.5%) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Moderate (2.5–14%) | 1.05 | 0.26 (0.795) | 0.71–1.57 | 1.14 | 0.75 (0.451) | 0.81–1.62 |
High (>14%) | 0.83 | −0.73 (0.468) | 0.50–1.38 | 0.85 | −0.68 (0.495) | 0.54–1.35 |
Percent Nonwhite Residents2 | ||||||
Low (<5.5%) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Moderate (5.5–29.5%) | 1.31 | 1.23 (0.219) | 0.85–2.01 | 0.84 | −0.98 (0.326) | 0.60–1.18 |
High (>29.5%) | 0.85 | −0.72 (0.474) | 0.54–1.34 | 0.42 | −3.82 (<0.001) | 0.27–0.66 |
Percent Below FPL Residents | ||||||
Low (<8%) | Reference | Reference | ||||
Moderate (8–22.5%) | 0.69 | −1.94 (0.052) | 0.48–1.00 | 0.94 | −0.33 (0.743) | 0.67–1.33 |
High (>22.5%) | 0.36 | −3.87 (<0.001) |
0.21–0.60 | 0.58 | −2.52 (0.012) | 0.38–0.89 |
Rural | 1.03 | 0.06 (0.953) | 0.43–2.43 | 1.60 | 1.33 (0.183) | 0.80–3.20 |
Top quartile hospitals had FUH-7 >41%; FUH-30 >65%
Number of observations = 1,079; Number of replications = 100; Wald chi2(20) = 66.49; Pseudo R2 = 0.0811
Note 3: Number of observations = 1,272; Number of replications = 100; Wald chi2(20) = 149.56; Pseudo R2 = 0.1136
Note 4: The z test and p values were calculated from the logistic regression coefficients and bootstrap standard errors.
Note 5: P Values of less than 0.0038 are determined to be significant based on Bonferroni adjustment