Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;49(1):84–96. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0195

Table 2. Study data of PV angles.

PV angle (degree) Average actual change (degree) Average relative change (%)
PV angle ①
MediGuide group (n=15)
M-EM-GEO 39.4±8.4 3.6±2.5 10.7±9.5
M-IM-GEO 41.4±11.0 6.5±3.5* 18.1±10.9*
Conventional group (n=40)
C-IM-GEO 37.9±5.6 5.9±1.7 16.5±6.5*
PV angle ②
MediGuide group (n=15)
M-EM-GEO 32.0±11.7 5.3±2.2 16.0±7.2
M-IM-GEO 28.7±9.6 9.3±3.1 27.6±8.1
Conventional group (n=40)
C-IM-GEO 29.9±9.9 7.6±2.1 24.6±6.7
PV angle ③
MediGuide group (n=15)
M-EM-GEO 51.5±6.8 2.8±2.7 6.1±7.3
M-IM-GEO 51.2±6.8 5.5±2.9* 11.7±7.6*
Conventional group (n=40)
C-IM-GEO 48.8±9.1 6.7±3.2 16.0±14.0
PV angle ④
MediGuide group (n=15)
M-EM-GEO 29.1±8.5 3.2±1.8 11.7±7.3
M-IM-GEO 30.7±8.2 5.9±2.6 21.8±12.1*
Conventional group (n=40)
C-IM-GEO 27.5±7.6 5.6±1.9 21.6±8.0

C-IM-GEO = Conventional group, impedance field-scaled geometry; M-EM-GEO = MediGuide group, electromagnetic field-scaled geometry; M-IM-GEO = MediGuide group, impedance field-scaled geometry; PV = pulmonary vein.

*p<0.05 vs. M-EM-GEO and p<0.01 vs. M-EM-GEO.