Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;9:1879. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01879

Table 5.

PCR evaluation of paired miRNA ratios in individual samples.

Cancer vs. Benign (53 vs. 40) Cancer vs. Normal (53 vs. 38) Cancer vs. Control (Benign + Normal) (53 vs. 78)
Number of ratios that significantly identified with fold change > 1.5 28 (Table 2) 28 (Table 3) 21 (Table 4)
Number of ratios selected in the final model 5 4 5
Name of ratios selected in the final model hsa-miR-30a-5p/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-192-5p/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-192-5p/hsa-miR-574-5p, hsa-miR-21-3p/hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-221-3p/miR-30a-5p (Figure 1) hsa-miR-324-3p/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-21-3p/hsa-miR-324-3p, hsa-miR-30a-5p/has-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-221-3p/has-miR-324-3p (Figure 2) hsa-miR-30e-5p/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-221-3p/hsa-miR-324-3p, hsa-miR-30a-5p/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-152/hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-192-5p/hsa-miR-382-5p (Figure 3)
Sensitivity 0.881 0.890 0.717
Specificity 0.775 0.925 0.782
PPV 0.827 0.889 0.691
NPV 0.756 0.891 0.803
AUC 0.901 0.901 0.820

Age as a co-founder was included in the model since it significantly differed between two groups. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were obtained from the final model after 10-fold cross-validation.