Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 14;9:109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36393-1

Table 3.

Results of the statistical analysis of the d′ data obtained in the discrimination task, for isolated sweep rates (shown in the bottom panels of Figs 1 and 2).

Sweep rate
(semitones/sec)
0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64
language F(1,130) = 8.7
*p = 0.004
F(1,132) = 20.8
*p < 0.001
F(1,135) = 14.1
*p < 0.001
F(1,137) = 25.7
*p < 0.001
hearing F(1,130) = 49.7
*p < 0.001
F(1,132) = 111.0
*p < 0.001
F(1,135) = 163.7
*p < 0.001
F(1,137) = 138.9
*p < 0.001
language × hearing F(1,130) = 6.5
*p = 0.012
F(1,132) = 6.6
*p = 0.011
F(1,135) = 9.7
*p = 0.002
F(1,137) = 7.8
*p = 0.006
NH-US vs. NH-Taiwan t(52) = 0.5,
p = 0.654
t(81) = 1.3,
p = 0.194
F(1,130) = 22.2
*p < 0.001
F(1,132) = 36.8
*p < 0.001
F(1,135) = 33.7
*p < 0.001
F(1,137) = 43.8
*p < 0.001
CI-US vs. CI-Taiwan F(1,130) < 0.1
p = 0.808
F(1,132) = 1.5
p = 0.223
F(1,135) = 0.2
p = 0.696
F(1,137) = 2.0
p = 0.161
t(57) = 0.4,
p = 0.660
t(57) = 0.7,
p = 0.507