Table 3.

Comparison of cell viability values among the groups treated with different α-CD derivatives (the number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance, p < 0.005 (*), p < 0.001 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).

Logarithm of Concentrations	−4	−3	−2	−1602	−1301
HPACD vs. Phosphated	**
HPACD vs. Polymer	*
HPACD vs. SuACD			*
Sulphated vs. Phosphated	**			****	****
Sulphated vs. SuACD				****	****
Phosphated vs. AcACD	**
Phosphated vs. CMACD			**	***	****
Phosphated vs. SuACD			***
Phosphated vs. Polymer			*	**	****
AcACD vs. Polymer	*
RAMEA vs. TRIMEA		*	****	****
RAMEA vs. HPACD		*	***	***	**
RAMEA vs. Sulphated		*	***	**
RAMEA vs. AcACD		**	****	****	**
RAMEA vs. Phosphatidylcholine + RAMEA		**	****	***	**
RAMEA vs. Phosphated			****	****	****
RAMEA vs. SuACD				****	****
RAMEA vs. Polymer				*
native vs. RAMEA			**	***	****
native vs. TRIMEA			****	****
native vs. Phosphated				*
native vs. SuACD				***
native vs. Sulphated					**
native vs. CMACD					**
native vs. Polymer					*
TRIMEA vs. Sulphated			****	****
TRIMEA vs. Phosphated			***
TRIMEA vs. CMACD			****	****
TRIMEA vs. SuACD			****
TRIMEA vs. Polymer			****	****
SuACD vs. AcACD			*
SuACD vs. Polymer				****	****
CMACD vs. SuACD				****	****