Table 1.
Analysis | Sham | Meniscus | OA | T(M) | Articular cartilage | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pathological analysis | ||||||
OA lesion score | 0.00±0.00bc | 0.05±0.05bc | 3.40±0.20ac | 1.60±0.21ab | 3.00±0.23ac | |
Maxima extension angle | 19.12±1.65b | 19.91±1.87b | 59.36±9.04ac | 26.22±4.00b | 57.36±8.67ac | |
BMD (g/cm2) | 0.35±0.02b | 0.34±0.04b | 0.27±0.01ac | 0.34±0.03b | 0.29±0.02ac | |
Medial Tibia lesion (%) | 0.00±0.00bc | 0.00±0.00bc | 80.93±10.46ac | 55.43±8.32ab | 87.04±6.82ac | |
Micro-CT analysis | ||||||
Sb.Th (μm) | Femur | 296.15±16.16 | 294.43±8.50 | 311.32±58.88 | 284.51±20.93 | 304.19±41.63 |
Tibia | 327.51±11.05b | 330.98±18.60 | 260.71±46.30ac | 332.41±20.55b | 301.66±50.00 | |
BV/TV % | Femur | 58.66±2.31b | 58.52±1.42b | 48.79±5.30ac | 59.29±4.63b | 50.27±4.24ac |
Tibia | 58.85±2.21b | 58.88±2.01b | 44.19±4.14ac | 62.59±2.44b | 45.65±3.66ac | |
Tb.Th (μm) | Femur | 149.75±4.74c | 143.82±5.64c | 157.48±21.20 | 164.58±7.37a | 162.54±20.57 |
Tibia | 146.07±8.50bc | 150.85±7.81bc | 193.65±17.06a | 187.85±13.35a | 200.87±19.27a | |
Tb.N (1/mm) | Femur | 4.03±0.22bc | 4.02±0.29bc | 2.97±0.53a | 3.35±0.26a | 2.60±0.41ac |
Tibia | 3.94±0.31bc | 4.04±0.40bc | 2.07±0.21ac | 2.89±0.38ab | 2.07±0.28ac | |
Porosity (%) | Femur | 41.34±2.07b | 41.48±1.27b | 51.21±4.74ac | 40.71±4.14b | 49.73±3.79ac |
Tibia | 41.15±2.21b | 41.12±2.01b | 55.81±4.14ac | 37.41±2.44b | 54.35±3.66ac |
Mean±SD obtained for all experimental groups with statistical results by one-way ANOVA, except OA lesion scores were expressed as mean ± SEM with statistical results by Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical significance p < 0.05: a =Sham vs. other groups; b =OA vs. other groups; c = T(M) vs. other groups. Sb.Th=Subchondral plate thickness, BV= Bone volume, TV=Tissue volume, Tb.Th=Trabecular bone thickness, Tb.N=Trabecular bone number.