Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 14;19:7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0220-3

Table 3.

Variables from R1 attaining ‘high agreement’ in R2

Variable domain Round One Round Two p-value
No of respondents Variable No (%) panellists ranking variable Important/ Very important No of respondents Variable No (%) panellists ranking variable Important/ Very important
Treatment 39 Time of completion of admitting/consulting team assessment to time of ED departure 26 (66.7%) 35 Time of completion of admitting/consulting team assessment in the ED to time of ED departure 25 (71.4%) 0.66
Treatment 39 ICU admission rate 22 (56.4%) 35 ICU admission rate 30 (85.7%) 0.01
Implementation 35 ICU referral rate 23 (65.7%) 32 ICU referral rate 25 (78.1%) 0.78
Implementation 35 Resuscitation room activity level 22 (62.9%) 32 Resuscitation room activity level 30 (93.8%) 0.01
Implementation 35 Number of times ISBAR communication tool was used to communicate the need for escalation 22 (62.9%) 32 Number of times ISBAR communication tool was used to communicate the need for escalation 25 (78.1%) 0.52
Implementation 35 Health Professionals Work Index (HPWI) survey to measure autonomy and control over practice; work place relationships; managerial support and availability of resources 20 (57.1%) 32 Staff perception of availability of support and resources 27 (84.4%) 0.04
Implementation 35 Number of people being triaged 18 (51.4%) 32 Number of patients triaged 27 (84.4%) 0.01
Implementation 35 Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire to measure job satisfaction 16 (45.7%) 32 Job satisfaction for ED staff 30 (93.8%) < 0.001
Treatment (Round 1) /utcome (Round 2) 39 Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 2 days of having been assessed and treated and deemed appropriate for admission to a hospital ward from ED 25 (64.1%) 31 Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 2 h of having been assessed and treated and deemed appropriate for admission to the ICU from the ED 22 (71.0%) 0.55
Outcome 34 In-hospital mortality rate 23 (67.6%) 31 In-hospital mortality rate 24 (77.4%) 0.38
Balancing 32 Service delivery measured through e.g. resources (beds, equipment etc.) against recommended requirements 22 (68.8%) 30 Service delivery measured through e.g. available resources (beds, equipment etc.) against recommended requirements 23 (76.7%) 0.72
Balancing 32 Average length of stay (AVLOS) in hospital for patients who come through ED 22 (68.8%) 30 Average length of stay (AVLOS) in hospital for patients who come through ED 23 (76.7%) 0.72
Balancing 32 Number of patients waiting for in-patient beds 21 (65.6%) 30 Number of patients who are in the ED waiting for in-patient beds 24 (80.0%) 0.30