Abstract
Purpose
The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology started an online cycle‐based assisted reproductive technology (ART) registry system in 2007. This report presents the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART registered for the cycles practiced during 2016.
Methods
Cycle‐specific information for all ART cycles implemented in participating ART facilities were collected. A descriptive analysis was conducted for the registry database of 2016.
Results
In total, 447 790 treatment cycles and 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan) were reported in 2016. The mean patients’ age was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5). Among the egg retrieval cycles, 104 575 of 251 399 (41.6%) were freeze‐all cycles without fresh embryo transfers (ET), while fresh ET was performed in 64 497 cycles (58.4%). A total of 187 132 frozen‐thawed ET cycles were reported, resulting in 62 432 pregnancies and 44 484 neonates born. Single ET was selected for 81.0% of fresh transfers and 82.7% of frozen cycles, resulting in singleton pregnancy/live birth rates of 97.0%/96.4% and 96.7%/96.4%, respectively.
Conclusion
The total ART cycles and subsequent live births continued to increase in 2016. Single ET was performed more than 80%, and ET has shifted from using fresh embryos to frozen ones.
Keywords: ART registry, freeze‐all, in vitro fertilization, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, single embryo transfer
1. INTRODUCTION
In Japan, the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in 1983, and thereafter, the annual number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles has dramatically increased year by year. Japan has become one of the largest users of ART worldwide in terms of the annual number of treatment cycles done.1
Records of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of ART are crucial to monitor trends and situations of ART treatment implemented in a country. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) started an ART registry system in 1986. In 2007, the JSOG launched an online registration system and collected cycle‐specific information for all ART treatment cycles implemented in ART facilities. The aim of this study was to report the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART cycles registered during 2016 following the previous report.2
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Since 2007, the JSOG has requested all participating ART clinics and hospitals to register cycle‐specific information for all treatment cycles. The information includes patient characteristics, information on ART treatment, and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Details on the information collected in the registry have been reported previously.3 For ART cycles conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2016, JSOG requested registration of the information via an online registry system by the end of November 2017. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Saitama Medical University and ethics committee at the JSOG.
Using the database registered for 2016, a descriptive analysis was performed to investigate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles, freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles, pregnancies, and neonates were compared with that in previous years. The characteristics of the registered cycles and treatment outcomes were described for fresh and FET cycles. Treatment outcomes included the pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates, multiple pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes for ectopic pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy coexisting with an ectopic pregnancy, artificial abortion, stillbirth, and fetal reduction. Furthermore, the treatment outcomes of pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy rates were analyzed according to patient age. Treatment outcomes for cycles using frozen‐thawed oocytes were also reported.
3. RESULTS
There were 604 registered ART facilities in 2016, of which 603 participated in the ART registration system. The number of facilities that actually implemented ART treatment in 2016 was 587; 16 registered facilities did not implement ART cycles. The trends in the number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, pregnancies, and neonates for IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and FET cycles from 1985 to 2016 are shown in Table 1. In 2016, 447 790 cycles were registered and 54 110 neonates were recorded, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan (total number of neonates was 976 979 in 2016). The total number of registered cycles demonstrated an increasing trend from 1985 to 2016 for both fresh ET and FET cycles. In 2016, the numbers of cycles registered for fresh IVF, fresh ICSI, and FET cycles were 94 566, 161 262, and 191 962, respectively. The total number of freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles showed an increasing trend both for IVF and ICSI cycles, and 34 188/92 185 IVF (37.1%) and 70 387/159 214 ICSI (44.2%) cycles used freeze‐all embryos/oocytes in 2016, resulting in fewer fresh ET cycles in 2016 than in 2015. In terms of FET cycles, 188 388 FETs were performed resulting in 62 749 pregnancies and 44 678 neonates in 2016.
Table 1.
Year | Fresh cycles | FET cycles[Link] | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVF[Link] | ICSI[Link] | No. of registered cycles | No. of ET cycles | No. of cycles with pregnancy | No. of neonates | |||||||||||
No. of registered cycles | No. of egg retrieval | No. of freeze‐all cycles | No. of ET cycles | No. of cycles with pregnancy | No. of neonates | No. of registered cycles | No. of egg retrieval | No. of freeze‐all cycles | No. of ET cycles | No. of cycles with pregnancy | No. of neonates | |||||
1985 | 1195 | 1195 | 862 | 64 | 27 | |||||||||||
1986 | 752 | 752 | 556 | 56 | 16 | |||||||||||
1987 | 1503 | 1503 | 1070 | 135 | 54 | |||||||||||
1988 | 1702 | 1702 | 1665 | 257 | 114 | |||||||||||
1989 | 4218 | 3890 | 2968 | 580 | 446 | 184 | 92 | 7 | 3 | |||||||
1990 | 7405 | 6892 | 5361 | 1178 | 1031 | 160 | 153 | 17 | 17 | |||||||
1991 | 11 177 | 10 581 | 8473 | 2015 | 1661 | 369 | 352 | 57 | 39 | |||||||
1992 | 17 404 | 16 381 | 12 250 | 2702 | 2525 | 963 | 936 | 524 | 42 | 35 | 553 | 530 | 79 | 66 | ||
1993 | 21 287 | 20 345 | 15 565 | 3730 | 3334 | 2608 | 2447 | 1271 | 176 | 149 | 681 | 597 | 86 | 71 | ||
1994 | 25 157 | 24 033 | 18 690 | 4069 | 3734 | 5510 | 5339 | 4114 | 759 | 698 | 1303 | 1112 | 179 | 144 | ||
1995 | 26 648 | 24 694 | 18 905 | 4246 | 3810 | 9820 | 9054 | 7722 | 1732 | 1579 | 1682 | 1426 | 323 | 298 | ||
1996 | 27 338 | 26 385 | 21 492 | 4818 | 4436 | 13 438 | 13 044 | 11 269 | 2799 | 2588 | 2900 | 2676 | 449 | 386 | ||
1997 | 32 247 | 30 733 | 24 768 | 5730 | 5060 | 16 573 | 16 376 | 14 275 | 3495 | 3249 | 5208 | 4958 | 1086 | 902 | ||
1998 | 34 929 | 33 670 | 27 436 | 6255 | 5851 | 18 657 | 18 266 | 15 505 | 3952 | 3701 | 8132 | 7643 | 1748 | 1567 | ||
1999 | 36 085 | 34 290 | 27 455 | 6812 | 5870 | 22 984 | 22 350 | 18 592 | 4702 | 4247 | 9950 | 9093 | 2198 | 1812 | ||
2000 | 31 334 | 29 907 | 24 447 | 6328 | 5447 | 26 712 | 25 794 | 21 067 | 5240 | 4582 | 11 653 | 10 719 | 2660 | 2245 | ||
2001 | 32 676 | 31 051 | 25 143 | 6749 | 5829 | 30 369 | 29 309 | 23 058 | 5924 | 4862 | 13 034 | 11 888 | 3080 | 2467 | ||
2002 | 34 953 | 33 849 | 26 854 | 7767 | 6443 | 34 824 | 33 823 | 25 866 | 6775 | 5486 | 15 887 | 14 759 | 4094 | 3299 | ||
2003 | 38 575 | 36 480 | 28 214 | 8336 | 6608 | 38 871 | 36 663 | 27 895 | 7506 | 5994 | 24 459 | 19 641 | 6205 | 4798 | ||
2004 | 41 619 | 39 656 | 29 090 | 8542 | 6709 | 44 698 | 43 628 | 29 946 | 7768 | 5921 | 30 287 | 24 422 | 7606 | 5538 | ||
2005 | 42 822 | 40 471 | 29 337 | 8893 | 6706 | 47 579 | 45 388 | 30 983 | 8019 | 5864 | 35 069 | 28 743 | 9396 | 6542 | ||
2006 | 44 778 | 42 248 | 29 440 | 8509 | 6256 | 52 539 | 49 854 | 32 509 | 7904 | 5401 | 42 171 | 35 804 | 11 798 | 7930 | ||
2007 | 53 873 | 52 165 | 7626 | 28 228 | 7416 | 5144 | 61 813 | 60 294 | 11 541 | 34 032 | 7784 | 5194 | 45 478 | 43 589 | 13 965 | 9257 |
2008 | 59 148 | 57 217 | 10 139 | 29 124 | 6897 | 4664 | 71 350 | 69 864 | 15 390 | 34 425 | 7017 | 4615 | 60 115 | 57 846 | 18 597 | 12 425 |
2009 | 63 083 | 60 754 | 11 800 | 28 559 | 6891 | 5046 | 76 790 | 75 340 | 19 046 | 35 167 | 7330 | 5180 | 73 927 | 71 367 | 23 216 | 16 454 |
2010 | 67 714 | 64 966 | 13 843 | 27 905 | 6556 | 4657 | 90 677 | 88 822 | 24 379 | 37 172 | 7699 | 5277 | 83 770 | 81 300 | 27 382 | 19 011 |
2011 | 71 422 | 68 651 | 16 202 | 27 284 | 6341 | 4546 | 102 473 | 100 518 | 30 773 | 38 098 | 7601 | 5415 | 95 764 | 92 782 | 31 721 | 22 465 |
2012 | 82 108 | 79 434 | 20 627 | 29 693 | 6703 | 4740 | 125 229 | 122 962 | 41 943 | 40 829 | 7947 | 5498 | 119 089 | 116 176 | 39 106 | 27 715 |
2013 | 89 950 | 87 104 | 25 085 | 30 164 | 6817 | 4776 | 134 871 | 134 871 | 49 316 | 41 150 | 8027 | 5630 | 141 335 | 138 249 | 45 392 | 32 148 |
2014 | 92 269 | 89 397 | 27 624 | 30 414 | 6970 | 5025 | 144 247 | 141 888 | 55 851 | 41 437 | 8122 | 5702 | 157 229 | 153 977 | 51 458 | 36 595 |
2015 | 93 614 | 91 079 | 30 498 | 28 858 | 6478 | 4629 | 155 797 | 153 639 | 63 660 | 41 396 | 8169 | 5761 | 174 740 | 171 495 | 56 888 | 40 611 |
2016 | 94 566 | 92 185 | 34 188 | 26 182 | 5903 | 4266 | 161 262 | 159 214 | 70 387 | 38 315 | 7324 | 5166 | 191 962 | 188 338 | 62 749 | 44 678 |
ET, embryo transfer; FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.
Including gamete intrafallopian transfer.
Including Split‐ICSI cycles.
Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.
Distributions of patients’ age in registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy and live birth are shown in Figure 1. The patients’ mean age for the registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), while the mean age for pregnancy and live birth cycles was 36.2 years (SD = 4.1) and 35.6 years (SD = 4.0), respectively.
The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the registered fresh cycles are shown in Table 2. There were 89 857 registered IVF cycles, 24 754 split‐ICSI cycles, 133 709 ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm, 2799 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm extraction (TESE), 27 gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles, 462 cycles with oocyte freezing based on medical indications, and 4220 other cycles. Of the 251 399 cycles with oocyte retrieval, 104 575 (41.6%) were freeze‐all cycles. The pregnancy rate per ET was 22.7% for IVF and 18.2% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm. Single ET was performed at a rate of 81.0% with a pregnancy rate of 20.8%. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 25.9% for IVF, 28.5% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm, and 27.6% for ICSI with TESE, resulting in respective live birth rates per ET of 15.9%, 12.3%, and 10.3%. Singleton pregnancy rate and live birth rate were 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively.
Table 2.
Variables | IVF‐ET | Split | ICSI | GIFT | Frozen oocyte | Others[Link] | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ejaculated sperm | TESE | |||||||
No. of registered cycles | 89 857 | 24 754 | 133 709 | 2799 | 27 | 462 | 4220 | 255 828 |
No. of egg retrieval | 87 656 | 24 545 | 131 873 | 2796 | 27 | 454 | 4048 | 251 399 |
No. of fresh ET cycles | 25 649 | 6499 | 30 917 | 899 | 27 | ‐ | 506 | 64 497 |
No. of freeze‐all cycles | 32 379 | 15 090 | 54 036 | 1261 | 0 | 395 | 1414 | 104 575 |
No. of cycles with pregnancy | 5817 | 1555 | 5635 | 134 | 1 | ‐ | 85 | 13 227 |
Pregnancy rate per ET (%) | 22.7 | 23.9 | 18.2 | 14.9 | 3.7 | ‐ | 16.8 | 20.5 |
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval (%) | 6.6 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 3.7 | ‐ | 2.1 | 5.3 |
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval excluding freeze‐all cycles(%) | 10.5 | 16.4 | 7.2 | 8.7 | 3.7 | ‐ | 3.2 | 9.0 |
SET cycles | 21 199 | 5606 | 24 517 | 548 | 3 | ‐ | 365 | 52 238 |
Pregnancy following SET cycles | 4825 | 1372 | 4484 | 94 | 0 | ‐ | 65 | 10 840 |
Rate of SET cycles | 82.7% | 86.3% | 79.3% | 61.0% | 11.1% | ‐ | 72.1% | 81.0% |
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles | 22.8% | 24.5% | 18.3% | 17.2% | 0.0% | ‐ | 17.8% | 20.8% |
Miscarriages | 1508 | 357 | 1605 | 37 | 0 | ‐ | 24 | 3531 |
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy | 25.9% | 23.0% | 28.5% | 27.6% | 0.0% | ‐ | 28.2% | 26.7% |
Singleton pregnancies[Link] | 5518 | 1496 | 5318 | 121 | 1 | ‐ | 82 | 12 536 |
Multiple pregnancies[Link] | 181 | 31 | 170 | 3 | 0 | ‐ | 1 | 386 |
Twin pregnancies[Link] | 180 | 31 | 168 | 3 | 0 | ‐ | 1 | 383 |
Triplet pregnancies[Link] | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 3 |
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 0 |
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] | 3.2 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 0.0 | ‐ | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Live births | 4078 | 1123 | 3806 | 93 | 1 | ‐ | 58 | 9159 |
Live birth rate per ET (%) | 15.9 | 17.3 | 12.3 | 10.3 | 3.7 | ‐ | 11.5 | 14.2 |
Total number of neonates | 4206 | 1155 | 3916 | 95 | 1 | ‐ | 59 | 9432 |
Singleton live births | 3930 | 1090 | 3666 | 89 | 1 | ‐ | 57 | 8833 |
Twin live births | 135 | 31 | 122 | 3 | 0 | ‐ | 1 | 292 |
Triplet live births | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 5 |
Quadruplet live births | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 0 |
Pregnancy outcomes | ||||||||
Ectopic pregnancies | 68 | 26 | 77 | 1 | 0 | ‐ | 2 | 174 |
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 2 |
Artificial abortions | 23 | 6 | 28 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 1 | 58 |
Stillbirths | 22 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 46 |
Fetal reductions | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 1 |
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes | 105 | 35 | 95 | 3 | 0 | ‐ | 0 | 238 |
ET, embryo transfer; GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF‐ET, in vitro fertilization‐embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer; TESE, testicular sperm extraction.
Others include ZIFT.
Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.
The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the FET cycles are shown in Table 3. There were 190 541 registered cycles, of which FET was performed in 187 132 cycles leading to 62 434 pregnancies (pregnancy rate per FET = 33.4%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 26.5%, resulting in a 23.0% live birth rate per ET. Single ET was performed at a rate of 82.7%, and the singleton pregnancy and live birth rate was 96.7% and 96.4%, respectively.
Table 3.
Variables | FET | Others[Link] | Total |
---|---|---|---|
No. of registered cycles | 190 541 | 1222 | 191 763 |
No. of FET | 187 132 | 1100 | 188 232 |
No. of cycles with pregnancy | 62 432 | 294 | 62 726 |
Pregnancy rate per FET (%) | 33.4 | 26.7 | 33.3 |
SET cycles | 154 801 | 849 | 155 650 |
Pregnancy following SET cycles | 53 130 | 230 | 53 360 |
Rate of SET cycles (%) | 82.7 | 77.2 | 82.7 |
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles (%) | 34.3 | 27.1 | 34.3 |
Miscarriages | 16 552 | 84 | 16 636 |
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%) | 26.5 | 28.6 | 26.5 |
Singleton pregnancies[Link] | 59 472 | 257 | 59 729 |
Multiple pregnancies[Link] | 2020 | 12 | 2032 |
Twin pregnancies[Link] | 1979 | 11 | 1990 |
Triplet pregnancies[Link] | 38 | 1 | 39 |
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] | 3.3 | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Live births | 43 153 | 176 | 43 329 |
Live birth rate per FET (%) | 23.1 | 16.0 | 23.0 |
Total number of neonates | 44 484 | 178 | 44 662 |
Singleton live births | 41 615 | 170 | 41 785 |
Twin live births | 1412 | 4 | 1416 |
Triplet live births | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Quadruplet live births | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pregnancy outcomes | |||
Ectopic pregnancies | 357 | 2 | 359 |
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Artificial abortions | 277 | 1 | 278 |
Stillbirths | 175 | 2 | 177 |
Fetal reduction | 23 | 1 | 24 |
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes | 1702 | 11 | 1713 |
FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.
Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.
Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.
The treatment outcomes of registered cycles including pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, and multiple pregnancy rates according to patients’ age are shown in Table 4. Similarly, the distribution of the pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age is shown in Figure 2. The pregnancy rate per ET exceeded 40% up to 33 years of age, gradually fell below 30% after 39 years of age and below 10% after 44 years of age. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17% for those under 32 years of age and gradually increased with an increase in patient age. The miscarriage rate was below 20% under 35 years of age but gradually increased to 34.3% and 52.6% for those of 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. The live birth rate per registered cycle was around 20% up to 33 years of age and decreased to 9.0% and 2.8% at 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. Multiple pregnancy rates varied between 2% and 3% across most of the age groups.
Table 4.
Age (y) | No. of registered cycles | No. of ET cycles | Pregnancy | Live birth | Miscarriage | Pregnancy rate per ET (%) | Pregnancy rate per registered cycles (%) | Live birth rate per registered cycles (%) | Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%) | Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Under 20s | 39 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
21 | 29 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 46.2 | 20.7 | 13.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 |
22 | 71 | 37 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 29.7 | 15.5 | 12.7 | 18.2 | 0.0 |
23 | 160 | 86 | 37 | 32 | 4 | 43.0 | 23.1 | 20.0 | 10.8 | 0.0 |
24 | 364 | 211 | 98 | 77 | 15 | 46.4 | 26.9 | 21.2 | 15.3 | 7.3 |
25 | 748 | 440 | 189 | 143 | 37 | 43.0 | 25.3 | 19.1 | 19.6 | 3.8 |
26 | 1463 | 903 | 386 | 294 | 73 | 42.7 | 26.4 | 20.1 | 18.9 | 3.4 |
27 | 2581 | 1631 | 737 | 568 | 130 | 45.2 | 28.6 | 22.0 | 17.6 | 3.4 |
28 | 4658 | 2898 | 1310 | 1035 | 216 | 45.2 | 28.1 | 22.2 | 16.5 | 2.7 |
29 | 7139 | 4527 | 1939 | 1520 | 327 | 42.8 | 27.2 | 21.3 | 16.9 | 3.0 |
30 | 10 020 | 6349 | 2729 | 2134 | 475 | 43.0 | 27.2 | 21.3 | 17.4 | 3.0 |
31 | 12 951 | 8156 | 3434 | 2667 | 613 | 42.1 | 26.5 | 20.6 | 17.9 | 2.9 |
32 | 15 832 | 10 066 | 4184 | 3249 | 755 | 41.6 | 26.4 | 20.5 | 18.0 | 3.2 |
33 | 18 966 | 12 138 | 4909 | 3784 | 900 | 40.4 | 25.9 | 20.0 | 18.3 | 3.1 |
34 | 22 690 | 14 345 | 5649 | 4302 | 1120 | 39.4 | 24.9 | 19.0 | 19.8 | 2.7 |
35 | 25 444 | 16 180 | 6284 | 4727 | 1288 | 38.8 | 24.7 | 18.6 | 20.5 | 3.8 |
36 | 28 303 | 17 667 | 6412 | 4661 | 1467 | 36.3 | 22.7 | 16.5 | 22.9 | 3.4 |
37 | 31 195 | 19 264 | 6926 | 4899 | 1716 | 36.0 | 22.2 | 15.7 | 24.8 | 3.6 |
38 | 34 733 | 20 929 | 6759 | 4676 | 1782 | 32.3 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 26.4 | 3.3 |
39 | 38 677 | 22 607 | 6703 | 4454 | 1953 | 29.7 | 17.3 | 11.5 | 29.1 | 3.5 |
40 | 39 752 | 22 168 | 5773 | 3567 | 1978 | 26.0 | 14.5 | 9.0 | 34.3 | 3.8 |
41 | 39 219 | 20 971 | 4771 | 2691 | 1895 | 22.8 | 12.2 | 6.9 | 39.7 | 3.2 |
42 | 38 048 | 19 208 | 3397 | 1717 | 1532 | 17.7 | 8.9 | 4.5 | 45.1 | 2.5 |
43 | 29 011 | 13 771 | 1918 | 820 | 1009 | 13.9 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 52.6 | 2.7 |
44 | 20 313 | 8823 | 930 | 330 | 565 | 10.5 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 60.8 | 2.4 |
45 | 12 560 | 4961 | 319 | 92 | 208 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 65.2 | 2.0 |
46 | 6437 | 2389 | 112 | 36 | 73 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 65.2 | 0.0 |
47 | 3418 | 1146 | 33 | 10 | 22 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 66.7 | 0.0 |
48 | 1716 | 547 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 88.9 | 0.0 |
49 | 772 | 243 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 66.7 | 0.0 |
Over 50s | 481 | 158 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 40.0 | 0.0 |
ET, embryo transfer.
Multiple pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.
The treatment outcomes for FET using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications are shown in Table 5. The total number of FET using frozen oocytes was 106 cycles, of which 23 cycles resulted in a pregnancy (pregnancy rate per FET = 21.1%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17.4%, resulting in a 15.1% live birth rate per ET.
Table 5.
Variables | Embryo transfer using frozen‐thawed oocyte |
---|---|
No. of registered cycles | 199 |
No. of ET | 106 |
No. of cycles with pregnancy | 23 |
Pregnancy rate per ET | 21.7% |
SET cycles | 68 |
Pregnancy following SET cycles | 15 |
Rate of SET cycles | 64.2% |
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles | 22.1% |
Miscarriages | 4 |
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy | 17.4% |
Singleton pregnancies[Link] | 23 |
Multiple pregnancies[Link] | 0 |
Twin pregnancies[Link] | 0 |
Triplet pregnancies[Link] | 0 |
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] | 0 |
Multiple pregnancy rate[Link] | 0 |
Live births | 16 |
Live birth rate per ET | 15.1% |
Total number of neonates | 16 |
Singleton live births | 16 |
Twin live births | 0 |
Triplet live births | 0 |
Quadruplet live births | 0 |
Pregnancy outcomes | |
Ectopic pregnancies | 0 |
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy | 0 |
Artificial abortions | 0 |
Still births | 0 |
Fetal reduction | 0 |
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes | 3 |
ET, embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.
Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.
4. DISCUSSION
Using the current Japanese ART registry system, this study demonstrated that the total number of registered ART cycles was 447 790, and resultant live births were 54 110, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan in 2016. These figures are the largest since the registry started. Single ET was performed at rates of more than 80% for both fresh and frozen cycles, resulting in a singleton live birth rate of 96% in total. The number of freeze‐all cycles increased, resulting in a reduction in the number of fresh ET cycles. These results represent the latest clinical practice of ART in Japan.
One potential reason for the rising number of ART cycles is the advancing age of patients receiving ART. In the registered cycles, the mean age of registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), which was much higher than the mean age for cycles with live births (35.6 years, SD = 4.0). This age gap between patients receiving ART and patients who gave live birth after ART warrants further investigation. Patients’ age is the most important factor determining the probability of a live birth after ART. Since the pregnancy and live birth rates decreased as patients’ age increased (Table 4), the number of ET cycles resulting in a live birth would theoretically exceed that in patients of a younger age. Thus, substantial education of patients regarding the association between age and probabilities for pregnancy in ART is essential.
Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80% both for fresh and frozen cycles, which is the highest rate in the world.1 Single ET is one effective way to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes related to multiple births while maintaining a cumulative live birth rate.4 In 2008, JSOG recommended restricting the number of ETs to one in order to prevent multiple pregnancies, although double ET was allowed for women over 35 years of age or for women who experienced recurrent implantation failure. As a result, the rate of single ET dramatically increased from 49.9% in 2007 to 73.0% in 20105 and continues to rise (82.7% in FET cycles in 2016). The single ET policy has been credited with improving other indicators of perinatal outcomes in Japan.6
There was a significant transition to the freeze‐all policy (Table 1). Freeze‐all provides an effective treatment option for patients at high risk for ovarian hyper‐stimulation syndrome (OHSS), preventing the symptoms and severity becoming worse.7 A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in China demonstrated that the freeze‐all strategy had a significantly decreased risk for adverse outcomes such as OHSS and miscarriage, and a significantly higher rate of live birth among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients.8 Whether the freeze‐all strategy would improve ART outcomes among non‐PCOS patients remains unresolved. Observational investigations demonstrated that FET cycles resulted in better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes than fresh cycles,6, 9, 10 however, two RCTs published in 2018 revealed that the effect of the freeze‐all strategy on pregnancy outcomes (ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate) was not different between patients who had the freeze‐all strategy and who received fresh ET after oocyte retrievals.11, 12
The strengths of the Japanese ART registry system include its mandatory reporting system and high compliance rate. Patients cannot receive a government subsidy for a cycle if their ART facility does not register the cycle‐specific information. Almost all the participating ART clinics and hospitals (603 out of 604 facilities) registered cycle‐specific information, which is high among participating countries of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies.1 Since the Japanese ART registry system has such a significant compliance, the next step for improving the registration system is maintaining the quality of the database. In order to use the registry database for research purposes and for important feedback to participating ART facilities and patients, we need to maintain the integrity of registration, and to assess the validity of the registry, as done by other countries.13, 14 For example, by maintaining data quality, the United States registry system developed a patients’ and clinicians’ platform for the prediction of pregnancy and live birth rate (https://www.sart.org/), helpful for patients’ education and promoting appropriate informed consent at ART facilities. Thus, the need for ongoing improvements in the registration system for participating ART facilities and patients appears inevitable.
In conclusion, our analysis of the ART registry for 2016 demonstrated that the total number of ART cycles increased and resulted in 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates in Japan). The patients’ age receiving ART was significantly higher than the mean age of patients who had live birth. Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80%, resulting in a 96% singleton live birth rate. Ongoing investigation is required to determine the effect of the increasing use of freeze‐all cycles. These data represent the latest clinical practices of ART in Japan, and further improvements in the registration system in Japan will be important.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Saitama Medical University and the ethics committee at the JSOG.
DISCLOSURES
Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study. Human rights statement and informed consent: All the procedures accorded with the ethical standards of the relevant committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients in the study. Animal rights: This article does not contain any study that was performed by any of the authors that included animal participants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all of the registered facilities for their cooperation in providing their responses. We would also like to encourage these facilities to continue promoting the use of the online registry system and assisting us with our research. This study was supported by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants (H30‐Sukoyaka‐Ippan‐002). We thank Charles Allan, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Ishihara O, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:7–16. 10.1002/rmb2.12258
REFERENCES
- 1. Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1588‐1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Saito H, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by The Ethics Committee of The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(1):20‐28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Irahara M, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992‐2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16:126‐132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107‐120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Takeshima K, Saito H, Nakaza A, et al. Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan‐analysis of four‐year data from the national registry system. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):477‐484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Takeshima K, Jwa SC, Saito H, et al. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles—analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):337‐346.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mourad S, Brown J, Farquhar C. Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD012103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523‐533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(2):87‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995‐2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320‐1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, et al. IVF Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):137‐147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):126‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Stern JE, Gopal D, Liberman RF, Anderka M, Kotelchuck M, Luke B. Validation of birth outcomes from the society for assisted reproductive technology clinic outcome reporting system (SART CORS): population‐based analysis from the Massachusetts outcome study of assisted reproductive technology (MOSART). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):717‐722.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]