Skip to main content
Reproductive Medicine and Biology logoLink to Reproductive Medicine and Biology
. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):7–16. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12258

Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Osamu Ishihara 1, Seung Chik Jwa 1,, Akira Kuwahara 2, Tomonori Ishikawa 3, Koji Kugu 4, Rintaro Sawa 5,6, Kouji Banno 7, Minoru Irahara 2, Hidekazu Saito 8
PMCID: PMC6332769  PMID: 30655717

Abstract

Purpose

The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology started an online cycle‐based assisted reproductive technology (ART) registry system in 2007. This report presents the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART registered for the cycles practiced during 2016.

Methods

Cycle‐specific information for all ART cycles implemented in participating ART facilities were collected. A descriptive analysis was conducted for the registry database of 2016.

Results

In total, 447 790 treatment cycles and 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan) were reported in 2016. The mean patients’ age was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5). Among the egg retrieval cycles, 104 575 of 251 399 (41.6%) were freeze‐all cycles without fresh embryo transfers (ET), while fresh ET was performed in 64 497 cycles (58.4%). A total of 187 132 frozen‐thawed ET cycles were reported, resulting in 62 432 pregnancies and 44 484 neonates born. Single ET was selected for 81.0% of fresh transfers and 82.7% of frozen cycles, resulting in singleton pregnancy/live birth rates of 97.0%/96.4% and 96.7%/96.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

The total ART cycles and subsequent live births continued to increase in 2016. Single ET was performed more than 80%, and ET has shifted from using fresh embryos to frozen ones.

Keywords: ART registry, freeze‐all, in vitro fertilization, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, single embryo transfer

1. INTRODUCTION

In Japan, the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in 1983, and thereafter, the annual number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles has dramatically increased year by year. Japan has become one of the largest users of ART worldwide in terms of the annual number of treatment cycles done.1

Records of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of ART are crucial to monitor trends and situations of ART treatment implemented in a country. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) started an ART registry system in 1986. In 2007, the JSOG launched an online registration system and collected cycle‐specific information for all ART treatment cycles implemented in ART facilities. The aim of this study was to report the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART cycles registered during 2016 following the previous report.2

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 2007, the JSOG has requested all participating ART clinics and hospitals to register cycle‐specific information for all treatment cycles. The information includes patient characteristics, information on ART treatment, and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Details on the information collected in the registry have been reported previously.3 For ART cycles conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2016, JSOG requested registration of the information via an online registry system by the end of November 2017. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Saitama Medical University and ethics committee at the JSOG.

Using the database registered for 2016, a descriptive analysis was performed to investigate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles, freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles, pregnancies, and neonates were compared with that in previous years. The characteristics of the registered cycles and treatment outcomes were described for fresh and FET cycles. Treatment outcomes included the pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates, multiple pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes for ectopic pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy coexisting with an ectopic pregnancy, artificial abortion, stillbirth, and fetal reduction. Furthermore, the treatment outcomes of pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy rates were analyzed according to patient age. Treatment outcomes for cycles using frozen‐thawed oocytes were also reported.

3. RESULTS

There were 604 registered ART facilities in 2016, of which 603 participated in the ART registration system. The number of facilities that actually implemented ART treatment in 2016 was 587; 16 registered facilities did not implement ART cycles. The trends in the number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, pregnancies, and neonates for IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and FET cycles from 1985 to 2016 are shown in Table 1. In 2016, 447 790 cycles were registered and 54 110 neonates were recorded, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan (total number of neonates was 976 979 in 2016). The total number of registered cycles demonstrated an increasing trend from 1985 to 2016 for both fresh ET and FET cycles. In 2016, the numbers of cycles registered for fresh IVF, fresh ICSI, and FET cycles were 94 566, 161 262, and 191 962, respectively. The total number of freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles showed an increasing trend both for IVF and ICSI cycles, and 34 188/92 185 IVF (37.1%) and 70 387/159 214 ICSI (44.2%) cycles used freeze‐all embryos/oocytes in 2016, resulting in fewer fresh ET cycles in 2016 than in 2015. In terms of FET cycles, 188 388 FETs were performed resulting in 62 749 pregnancies and 44 678 neonates in 2016.

Table 1.

Trends in numbers of registered cycles, egg retrieval, pregnancy, and neonates according to IVF, ICSI, and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles, Japan, 1985‐2016

Year Fresh cycles FET cycles[Link]
IVF[Link] ICSI[Link] No. of registered cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates
No. of registered cycles No. of egg retrieval No. of freeze‐all cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates No. of registered cycles No. of egg retrieval No. of freeze‐all cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates
1985 1195 1195 862 64 27
1986 752 752 556 56 16
1987 1503 1503 1070 135 54
1988 1702 1702 1665 257 114
1989 4218 3890 2968 580 446 184 92 7 3
1990 7405 6892 5361 1178 1031 160 153 17 17
1991 11 177 10 581 8473 2015 1661 369 352 57 39
1992 17 404 16 381 12 250 2702 2525 963 936 524 42 35 553 530 79 66
1993 21 287 20 345 15 565 3730 3334 2608 2447 1271 176 149 681 597 86 71
1994 25 157 24 033 18 690 4069 3734 5510 5339 4114 759 698 1303 1112 179 144
1995 26 648 24 694 18 905 4246 3810 9820 9054 7722 1732 1579 1682 1426 323 298
1996 27 338 26 385 21 492 4818 4436 13 438 13 044 11 269 2799 2588 2900 2676 449 386
1997 32 247 30 733 24 768 5730 5060 16 573 16 376 14 275 3495 3249 5208 4958 1086 902
1998 34 929 33 670 27 436 6255 5851 18 657 18 266 15 505 3952 3701 8132 7643 1748 1567
1999 36 085 34 290 27 455 6812 5870 22 984 22 350 18 592 4702 4247 9950 9093 2198 1812
2000 31 334 29 907 24 447 6328 5447 26 712 25 794 21 067 5240 4582 11 653 10 719 2660 2245
2001 32 676 31 051 25 143 6749 5829 30 369 29 309 23 058 5924 4862 13 034 11 888 3080 2467
2002 34 953 33 849 26 854 7767 6443 34 824 33 823 25 866 6775 5486 15 887 14 759 4094 3299
2003 38 575 36 480 28 214 8336 6608 38 871 36 663 27 895 7506 5994 24 459 19 641 6205 4798
2004 41 619 39 656 29 090 8542 6709 44 698 43 628 29 946 7768 5921 30 287 24 422 7606 5538
2005 42 822 40 471 29 337 8893 6706 47 579 45 388 30 983 8019 5864 35 069 28 743 9396 6542
2006 44 778 42 248 29 440 8509 6256 52 539 49 854 32 509 7904 5401 42 171 35 804 11 798 7930
2007 53 873 52 165 7626 28 228 7416 5144 61 813 60 294 11 541 34 032 7784 5194 45 478 43 589 13 965 9257
2008 59 148 57 217 10 139 29 124 6897 4664 71 350 69 864 15 390 34 425 7017 4615 60 115 57 846 18 597 12 425
2009 63 083 60 754 11 800 28 559 6891 5046 76 790 75 340 19 046 35 167 7330 5180 73 927 71 367 23 216 16 454
2010 67 714 64 966 13 843 27 905 6556 4657 90 677 88 822 24 379 37 172 7699 5277 83 770 81 300 27 382 19 011
2011 71 422 68 651 16 202 27 284 6341 4546 102 473 100 518 30 773 38 098 7601 5415 95 764 92 782 31 721 22 465
2012 82 108 79 434 20 627 29 693 6703 4740 125 229 122 962 41 943 40 829 7947 5498 119 089 116 176 39 106 27 715
2013 89 950 87 104 25 085 30 164 6817 4776 134 871 134 871 49 316 41 150 8027 5630 141 335 138 249 45 392 32 148
2014 92 269 89 397 27 624 30 414 6970 5025 144 247 141 888 55 851 41 437 8122 5702 157 229 153 977 51 458 36 595
2015 93 614 91 079 30 498 28 858 6478 4629 155 797 153 639 63 660 41 396 8169 5761 174 740 171 495 56 888 40 611
2016 94 566 92 185 34 188 26 182 5903 4266 161 262 159 214 70 387 38 315 7324 5166 191 962 188 338 62 749 44 678

ET, embryo transfer; FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.

Including gamete intrafallopian transfer.

Including Split‐ICSI cycles.

Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.

Distributions of patients’ age in registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy and live birth are shown in Figure 1. The patients’ mean age for the registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), while the mean age for pregnancy and live birth cycles was 36.2 years (SD = 4.1) and 35.6 years (SD = 4.0), respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age distributions of registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy, and live birth. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsogart/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer

The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the registered fresh cycles are shown in Table 2. There were 89 857 registered IVF cycles, 24 754 split‐ICSI cycles, 133 709 ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm, 2799 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm extraction (TESE), 27 gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles, 462 cycles with oocyte freezing based on medical indications, and 4220 other cycles. Of the 251 399 cycles with oocyte retrieval, 104 575 (41.6%) were freeze‐all cycles. The pregnancy rate per ET was 22.7% for IVF and 18.2% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm. Single ET was performed at a rate of 81.0% with a pregnancy rate of 20.8%. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 25.9% for IVF, 28.5% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm, and 27.6% for ICSI with TESE, resulting in respective live birth rates per ET of 15.9%, 12.3%, and 10.3%. Singleton pregnancy rate and live birth rate were 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively.

Table 2.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

Variables IVF‐ET Split ICSI GIFT Frozen oocyte Others[Link] Total
Ejaculated sperm TESE
No. of registered cycles 89 857 24 754 133 709 2799 27 462 4220 255 828
No. of egg retrieval 87 656 24 545 131 873 2796 27 454 4048 251 399
No. of fresh ET cycles 25 649 6499 30 917 899 27 506 64 497
No. of freeze‐all cycles 32 379 15 090 54 036 1261 0 395 1414 104 575
No. of cycles with pregnancy 5817 1555 5635 134 1 85 13 227
Pregnancy rate per ET (%) 22.7 23.9 18.2 14.9 3.7 16.8 20.5
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval (%) 6.6 6.3 4.3 4.8 3.7 2.1 5.3
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval excluding freeze‐all cycles(%) 10.5 16.4 7.2 8.7 3.7 3.2 9.0
SET cycles 21 199 5606 24 517 548 3 365 52 238
Pregnancy following SET cycles 4825 1372 4484 94 0 65 10 840
Rate of SET cycles 82.7% 86.3% 79.3% 61.0% 11.1% 72.1% 81.0%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles 22.8% 24.5% 18.3% 17.2% 0.0% 17.8% 20.8%
Miscarriages 1508 357 1605 37 0 24 3531
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy 25.9% 23.0% 28.5% 27.6% 0.0% 28.2% 26.7%
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 5518 1496 5318 121 1 82 12 536
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 181 31 170 3 0 1 386
Twin pregnancies[Link] 180 31 168 3 0 1 383
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 1 0 2 0 0 0 3
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] 3.2 2.0 3.1 2.4 0.0 1.2 3.0
Live births 4078 1123 3806 93 1 58 9159
Live birth rate per ET (%) 15.9 17.3 12.3 10.3 3.7 11.5 14.2
Total number of neonates 4206 1155 3916 95 1 59 9432
Singleton live births 3930 1090 3666 89 1 57 8833
Twin live births 135 31 122 3 0 1 292
Triplet live births 2 1 2 0 0 0 5
Quadruplet live births 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies 68 26 77 1 0 2 174
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Artificial abortions 23 6 28 0 0 1 58
Stillbirths 22 5 19 0 0 0 46
Fetal reductions 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes 105 35 95 3 0 0 238

ET, embryo transfer; GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF‐ET, in vitro fertilization‐embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer; TESE, testicular sperm extraction.

Others include ZIFT.

Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the FET cycles are shown in Table 3. There were 190 541 registered cycles, of which FET was performed in 187 132 cycles leading to 62 434 pregnancies (pregnancy rate per FET = 33.4%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 26.5%, resulting in a 23.0% live birth rate per ET. Single ET was performed at a rate of 82.7%, and the singleton pregnancy and live birth rate was 96.7% and 96.4%, respectively.

Table 3.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of frozen cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

Variables FET Others[Link] Total
No. of registered cycles 190 541 1222 191 763
No. of FET 187 132 1100 188 232
No. of cycles with pregnancy 62 432 294 62 726
Pregnancy rate per FET (%) 33.4 26.7 33.3
SET cycles 154 801 849 155 650
Pregnancy following SET cycles 53 130 230 53 360
Rate of SET cycles (%) 82.7 77.2 82.7
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles (%) 34.3 27.1 34.3
Miscarriages 16 552 84 16 636
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%) 26.5 28.6 26.5
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 59 472 257 59 729
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 2020 12 2032
Twin pregnancies[Link] 1979 11 1990
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 38 1 39
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 3 0 3
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] 3.3 4.5 3.3
Live births 43 153 176 43 329
Live birth rate per FET (%) 23.1 16.0 23.0
Total number of neonates 44 484 178 44 662
Singleton live births 41 615 170 41 785
Twin live births 1412 4 1416
Triplet live births 15 0 15
Quadruplet live births 0 0 0
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies 357 2 359
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy 1 0 1
Artificial abortions 277 1 278
Stillbirths 175 2 177
Fetal reduction 23 1 24
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes 1702 11 1713

FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.

Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

The treatment outcomes of registered cycles including pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, and multiple pregnancy rates according to patients’ age are shown in Table 4. Similarly, the distribution of the pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age is shown in Figure 2. The pregnancy rate per ET exceeded 40% up to 33 years of age, gradually fell below 30% after 39 years of age and below 10% after 44 years of age. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17% for those under 32 years of age and gradually increased with an increase in patient age. The miscarriage rate was below 20% under 35 years of age but gradually increased to 34.3% and 52.6% for those of 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. The live birth rate per registered cycle was around 20% up to 33 years of age and decreased to 9.0% and 2.8% at 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. Multiple pregnancy rates varied between 2% and 3% across most of the age groups.

Table 4.

Treatment outcomes of registered cycles according to patients' age, Japan, 2016

Age (y) No. of registered cycles No. of ET cycles Pregnancy Live birth Miscarriage Pregnancy rate per ET (%) Pregnancy rate per registered cycles (%) Live birth rate per registered cycles (%) Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%) Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link]
Under 20s 39 3 1 1 0 33.3 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0
21 29 13 6 4 2 46.2 20.7 13.8 33.3 0.0
22 71 37 11 9 2 29.7 15.5 12.7 18.2 0.0
23 160 86 37 32 4 43.0 23.1 20.0 10.8 0.0
24 364 211 98 77 15 46.4 26.9 21.2 15.3 7.3
25 748 440 189 143 37 43.0 25.3 19.1 19.6 3.8
26 1463 903 386 294 73 42.7 26.4 20.1 18.9 3.4
27 2581 1631 737 568 130 45.2 28.6 22.0 17.6 3.4
28 4658 2898 1310 1035 216 45.2 28.1 22.2 16.5 2.7
29 7139 4527 1939 1520 327 42.8 27.2 21.3 16.9 3.0
30 10 020 6349 2729 2134 475 43.0 27.2 21.3 17.4 3.0
31 12 951 8156 3434 2667 613 42.1 26.5 20.6 17.9 2.9
32 15 832 10 066 4184 3249 755 41.6 26.4 20.5 18.0 3.2
33 18 966 12 138 4909 3784 900 40.4 25.9 20.0 18.3 3.1
34 22 690 14 345 5649 4302 1120 39.4 24.9 19.0 19.8 2.7
35 25 444 16 180 6284 4727 1288 38.8 24.7 18.6 20.5 3.8
36 28 303 17 667 6412 4661 1467 36.3 22.7 16.5 22.9 3.4
37 31 195 19 264 6926 4899 1716 36.0 22.2 15.7 24.8 3.6
38 34 733 20 929 6759 4676 1782 32.3 19.5 13.5 26.4 3.3
39 38 677 22 607 6703 4454 1953 29.7 17.3 11.5 29.1 3.5
40 39 752 22 168 5773 3567 1978 26.0 14.5 9.0 34.3 3.8
41 39 219 20 971 4771 2691 1895 22.8 12.2 6.9 39.7 3.2
42 38 048 19 208 3397 1717 1532 17.7 8.9 4.5 45.1 2.5
43 29 011 13 771 1918 820 1009 13.9 6.6 2.8 52.6 2.7
44 20 313 8823 930 330 565 10.5 4.6 1.6 60.8 2.4
45 12 560 4961 319 92 208 6.4 2.5 0.7 65.2 2.0
46 6437 2389 112 36 73 4.7 1.7 0.6 65.2 0.0
47 3418 1146 33 10 22 2.9 1.0 0.3 66.7 0.0
48 1716 547 9 1 8 1.6 0.5 0.1 88.9 0.0
49 772 243 6 1 4 2.5 0.8 0.1 66.7 0.0
Over 50s 481 158 5 3 2 3.2 1.0 0.6 40.0 0.0

ET, embryo transfer.

Multiple pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsog-art/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer

The treatment outcomes for FET using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications are shown in Table 5. The total number of FET using frozen oocytes was 106 cycles, of which 23 cycles resulted in a pregnancy (pregnancy rate per FET = 21.1%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17.4%, resulting in a 15.1% live birth rate per ET.

Table 5.

Treatment outcomes of embryo transfers using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

Variables Embryo transfer using frozen‐thawed oocyte
No. of registered cycles 199
No. of ET 106
No. of cycles with pregnancy 23
Pregnancy rate per ET 21.7%
SET cycles 68
Pregnancy following SET cycles 15
Rate of SET cycles 64.2%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles 22.1%
Miscarriages 4
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy 17.4%
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 23
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 0
Twin pregnancies[Link] 0
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 0
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 0
Multiple pregnancy rate[Link] 0
Live births 16
Live birth rate per ET 15.1%
Total number of neonates 16
Singleton live births 16
Twin live births 0
Triplet live births 0
Quadruplet live births 0
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies 0
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy 0
Artificial abortions 0
Still births 0
Fetal reduction 0
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes 3

ET, embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

4. DISCUSSION

Using the current Japanese ART registry system, this study demonstrated that the total number of registered ART cycles was 447 790, and resultant live births were 54 110, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan in 2016. These figures are the largest since the registry started. Single ET was performed at rates of more than 80% for both fresh and frozen cycles, resulting in a singleton live birth rate of 96% in total. The number of freeze‐all cycles increased, resulting in a reduction in the number of fresh ET cycles. These results represent the latest clinical practice of ART in Japan.

One potential reason for the rising number of ART cycles is the advancing age of patients receiving ART. In the registered cycles, the mean age of registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), which was much higher than the mean age for cycles with live births (35.6 years, SD = 4.0). This age gap between patients receiving ART and patients who gave live birth after ART warrants further investigation. Patients’ age is the most important factor determining the probability of a live birth after ART. Since the pregnancy and live birth rates decreased as patients’ age increased (Table 4), the number of ET cycles resulting in a live birth would theoretically exceed that in patients of a younger age. Thus, substantial education of patients regarding the association between age and probabilities for pregnancy in ART is essential.

Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80% both for fresh and frozen cycles, which is the highest rate in the world.1 Single ET is one effective way to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes related to multiple births while maintaining a cumulative live birth rate.4 In 2008, JSOG recommended restricting the number of ETs to one in order to prevent multiple pregnancies, although double ET was allowed for women over 35 years of age or for women who experienced recurrent implantation failure. As a result, the rate of single ET dramatically increased from 49.9% in 2007 to 73.0% in 20105 and continues to rise (82.7% in FET cycles in 2016). The single ET policy has been credited with improving other indicators of perinatal outcomes in Japan.6

There was a significant transition to the freeze‐all policy (Table 1). Freeze‐all provides an effective treatment option for patients at high risk for ovarian hyper‐stimulation syndrome (OHSS), preventing the symptoms and severity becoming worse.7 A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in China demonstrated that the freeze‐all strategy had a significantly decreased risk for adverse outcomes such as OHSS and miscarriage, and a significantly higher rate of live birth among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients.8 Whether the freeze‐all strategy would improve ART outcomes among non‐PCOS patients remains unresolved. Observational investigations demonstrated that FET cycles resulted in better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes than fresh cycles,6, 9, 10 however, two RCTs published in 2018 revealed that the effect of the freeze‐all strategy on pregnancy outcomes (ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate) was not different between patients who had the freeze‐all strategy and who received fresh ET after oocyte retrievals.11, 12

The strengths of the Japanese ART registry system include its mandatory reporting system and high compliance rate. Patients cannot receive a government subsidy for a cycle if their ART facility does not register the cycle‐specific information. Almost all the participating ART clinics and hospitals (603 out of 604 facilities) registered cycle‐specific information, which is high among participating countries of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies.1 Since the Japanese ART registry system has such a significant compliance, the next step for improving the registration system is maintaining the quality of the database. In order to use the registry database for research purposes and for important feedback to participating ART facilities and patients, we need to maintain the integrity of registration, and to assess the validity of the registry, as done by other countries.13, 14 For example, by maintaining data quality, the United States registry system developed a patients’ and clinicians’ platform for the prediction of pregnancy and live birth rate (https://www.sart.org/), helpful for patients’ education and promoting appropriate informed consent at ART facilities. Thus, the need for ongoing improvements in the registration system for participating ART facilities and patients appears inevitable.

In conclusion, our analysis of the ART registry for 2016 demonstrated that the total number of ART cycles increased and resulted in 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates in Japan). The patients’ age receiving ART was significantly higher than the mean age of patients who had live birth. Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80%, resulting in a 96% singleton live birth rate. Ongoing investigation is required to determine the effect of the increasing use of freeze‐all cycles. These data represent the latest clinical practices of ART in Japan, and further improvements in the registration system in Japan will be important.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Saitama Medical University and the ethics committee at the JSOG.

DISCLOSURES

Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study. Human rights statement and informed consent: All the procedures accorded with the ethical standards of the relevant committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients in the study. Animal rights: This article does not contain any study that was performed by any of the authors that included animal participants.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all of the registered facilities for their cooperation in providing their responses. We would also like to encourage these facilities to continue promoting the use of the online registry system and assisting us with our research. This study was supported by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants (H30‐Sukoyaka‐Ippan‐002). We thank Charles Allan, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Ishihara O, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:7–16. 10.1002/rmb2.12258

REFERENCES

  • 1. Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1588‐1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Saito H, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by The Ethics Committee of The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(1):20‐28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Irahara M, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992‐2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16:126‐132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107‐120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Takeshima K, Saito H, Nakaza A, et al. Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan‐analysis of four‐year data from the national registry system. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):477‐484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Takeshima K, Jwa SC, Saito H, et al. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles—analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):337‐346.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mourad S, Brown J, Farquhar C. Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD012103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523‐533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(2):87‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995‐2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320‐1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, et al. IVF Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):137‐147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):126‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stern JE, Gopal D, Liberman RF, Anderka M, Kotelchuck M, Luke B. Validation of birth outcomes from the society for assisted reproductive technology clinic outcome reporting system (SART CORS): population‐based analysis from the Massachusetts outcome study of assisted reproductive technology (MOSART). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):717‐722.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproductive Medicine and Biology are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

RESOURCES