Table 4.
Angus (n = 16) | Charolais (n = 16) (mean ± SEM) | Kinsella composite hybrid (n = 16) | |
---|---|---|---|
Bacteria | |||
Chao1 | |||
L-RFI | 317.03 ± 11.83 | 319.87 ± 12.95 | 381.88 ± 37.60 |
H-RFI | 337.64 ± 21.82 | 326.69 ± 16.70 | 358.74 ± 27.93 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NS |
Shannon evenness | |||
L-RFI | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.01 |
H-RFI | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.01 |
P value2 | NS | 0.03 | NS |
Simpson evenness | |||
L-RFI | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.00 |
H-RFI | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NS |
Shannon index | |||
L-RFI | 3.17 ± 0.05 | 3.28 ± 0.06 | 3.21 ± 0.04 |
H-RFI | 3.18 ± 0.06 | 3.06 ± 0.10 | 3.01 ± 0.07 |
P value2 | NS | NS | 0.04 |
Inverse Simpson | |||
L-RFI | 12.26 ± 0.96 | 13.89 ± 1.22 | 13.18 ± 0.74 |
H-RFI | 12.78 ± 0.97 | 10.96 ± 1.31 | 10.53 ± 1.14 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NS |
Archaea | |||
Chao1 | |||
L-RFI | 25.88 ± 1.03 | 28.06 ± 2.36 | 24.17 ± 0.95 |
H-RFI | 24.25 ± 1.22 | 24.65 ± 1.38 | 25.31 ± 1.32 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NS |
Shannon evenness | |||
L-RFI | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 |
H-RFI | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.01 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NS |
Simpson evenness | |||
L-RFI | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
H-RFI | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
P value2 | NS | 0.03 | NS |
Shannon index | |||
L-RFI | 2.00 ± 0.07 | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 2.07 ± 0.07 |
H-RFI | 1.98 ± 0.07 | 2.07 ± 0.04 | 2.05 ± 0.03 |
P value2 | NS | NS | NA |
Inverse Simpson | |||
L-RFI | 5.21 ± 0.51 | 4.74 ± 0.37 | 5.67 ± 0.46 |
H-RFI | 5.19 ± 0.50 | 5.93 ± 0.36 | 5.48 ± 0.14 |
P value2 | NS | 0.03 | NS |
NS not significant with P value not less than 0.05
1To make alpha-diversity indices comparable among samples, the number of sequences per sample was normalized to the lowest reads number for bacteria (n = 274,885) and archaea (n = 4263), respectively
2P values were obtained between H- and L-RFI groups within each breed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test