Table 4.
Grade 1,2 PE (n
= 16) |
Grade 3 PE (n
= 25) |
Pseudo-PE (n
= 27) |
Control (n
= 44) |
Grade 1,2 PE Versus Control |
Grade 1,2 PE Versus Pseudo-PE |
Grade 3 PE Versus Pseudo-PE |
Grade 1,2 PE Versus Grade 3 PE |
|
Total retinal VD images | ||||||||
Whole image capillary (M) | 35.7 ± 9.5 | 28.5 ± 8.4 | 28.3 ± 12.5 | 32.6 ± 8.1 | >0.99 | 0.10 | >0.99 | 0.08 |
PCD (M) | 37.7 ± 10.5 | 30.7 ± 9.2 | 29.7 ± 12.3 | 34.6 ± 8.3 | >0.99 | 0.08 | >0.99 | 0.11 |
Peripapillary total vessel (C) | 59.3 ± 4.2 | 54.5 ± 6.2 | 58.1 ± 4.3 | 61.4 ± 2.3 | 0.74 | >0.99 | 0.04 | 0.002 |
Inner retinal VD images | ||||||||
Whole image capillary (M) | 31.7 ± 8.8 | 25.9 ± 7.2 | 23.3 ± 6.8 | 28.8 ± 6.9 | >0.99 | 0.01 | 0.80 | 0.18 |
PCD (M) | 34.2 ± 9.7 | 27.0 ± 8.2 | 25.5 ± 8.3 | 31.8 ± 7.4 | >0.99 | 0.01 | >0.99 | 0.06 |
Peripapillary total vessel (C) | 61.2 ± 4.9 | 56.6 ± 6.2 | 58.9 ± 4.7 | 63.2 ± 3.0 | >0.99 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.01 |
values are based on linear mixed model. PE, papilledema; VD, vessel density.