Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;44(3):555–563. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0246-y

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of behavioral responses in the recognition memory task

Response category Hits CR FA Miss
Placebo: % of responsesa 53.59 (3.1) 61.71 (2.7) 38.54 (2.9) 46.84 (3.3)
Haloperidol: % of responsesa 59.15 (2.0) 65.58 (2.5) 35.12 (2.6) 40.34 (2.0)
Placebo: mean confidenceb 1.89 (0.06) 1.73 (0.07) 1.58 (0.06) 1.59 (0.07)
Haloperidol: mean confidenceb 1.99 (0.05) 1.80 (0.04) 1.56 (0.05) 1.65 (0.05)
Placebo: mean pleasantnessc 63.34 (2.3) 57.66 (3.1) 55.33 (2.2) 54.15 (2.9)
Haloperidol: mean pleasantnessc 63.74 (2.3) 55.79 (2.6) 52.76 (2.2) 51.51 (2.5)
Placebo: mean RTd (s) 2.12 (0.09) 2.17 (0.06) 2.15 (0.08) 2.16 (0.07)
Haloperidol: mean RTd (s) 1.98 (0.08) 2.06 (0.08) 2.05 (0.08) 2.07 (0.08)

Numbers within parentheses denote the standard error. Confidence: 1 = low, 3 = high; pleasantness: 1 = low, 100 = high.

a Hit/CR/FA/miss rates: significant group × accuracy interaction: F(1,52) = 6.19, p = 0.02; but no significant group differences for individual rates (all p > 0.10)

b Confidence: main effect of group: F(1,52) = 0.64, p = 0.43; group × old/new rating × accuracy interaction: F(1, 52) = 2.98 (p = 0.09)

c Pleasantness: main effect of group: t(52) = 0.48, p = 0.64; all group × condition interactions (p > 0.20)

d RT: main effect of group: t(52) = 1.16, p = 0.25; all group × condition interactions (p > 0.15)