Table 1.
Electrochemical Parameters of the Potentidynamic Polarization Curve of Different Samples in an SBF Solution compared to previous studies for AZ31 alloy.
| Coating Material | Coating Technique | Corrosion properties | Immersion solution | Antibacterial Effect | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECorr (V) | Icorr (µA/cm2) | CR (mmPY) | |||||
| Bare AZ31 | None | −1.48 | 25.137 | 82.24 | SBF | N/A | This study |
| Bare-PDA | Dip coating | −1.37 | 5.6 | 18.34 | SBF | N/A | This study |
| HF-PDA | Dip coating | −1.45 | 3.189 | 10.43 | SBF | N/A | This study |
| HF-PDA-Ag | Dip coating | −1.33 | 2.33 | 7.61 | SBF | Ag | This study |
| HF-PDA-Au | Dip coating | −1.17 | 2.47 | 8.07 | SBF | Au | This study |
| HA | Aerosol deposition | −1.56 | 4.76 | N/A | SBF | N/A | 54 |
| Zn-Ca coating | Dip coating | −1.49 | 11.5 | N/A | 3.5 wt% NaCl | N/A | 55 |
| BTSE-coated | Dip coating | N/A | 2.69 | N/A | SBF | N/A | 56 |
| PLA | Dip coating | −1.28 | 1.798 | 19.837 | SBF | N/A | 57 |
| PCL/ZnO 3wt% | Electrospinning | −1.15 | 2.11 | N/A | SBF | ZnO | 18 |
| PCL | Dip coating | −1.5 | 33.5 | N/A | DMEM | N/A | 58 |
| SBF/ZrO2 NPs | Anodization | −1.41 | 3.17 | N/A | SBF | N/A | 8 |
| Mg-PDA@TiO2 | Dip coating | −1.28 | 2.04 | N/A | PBS | N/A | 59 |
| Mg-PDA | Dip coating | −1.54 | 13.85 | N/A | PBS | N/A | 59 |
| PLA/ZnO | Dip coating | −0.61 | 0.471 | 5.199 | SBF | ZnO | 60 |
*N/A This mean that not measured or has no effect on antibacterial.