Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 2;2019:5468381. doi: 10.1155/2019/5468381

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of socioeconomic predictors of willingness-to-pay for solid waste management services.

Variables Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age in years 1.01 (1.00, 1.02)
Male gender
 Male 0.96 (0.79, 1.17)
 Female 1.00
Educational level
 No formal education 1.00 1.00
 Basic education 1.53 (0.96, 2.46) 1.76 (1.01, 3.06)
 Senior high school 1.94 (1.26., 2.30) 2.52 (1.48, 4.30)
 Postsecondary 1.51 (0.92, 2.49) 1.97 (1.08, 3.60)
 Tertiary 2.19 (1.47, 3.26) 3.30 (1.91, 5.69)
Marital status
 Married 1.00 1.00
 Cohabiting 1.20 (0.97, 1.47) 1.47 (1.13, 1.93)
 Single 1.01 (0.56, 1.84) 3.61 (1.53, 8.52)
 Widowed/divorced 0.77 (0.42, 1.43) 0.32 (0.12, 0.81)
Employed
 Yes 1.63 (1.09, 2.45)
 No 1.00
Area of occupation
 Government (civil servants) 1.00 1.00
 Private 0.81 (0.60, 1.08) 0.56 (0.40, 0.81)
 Self-employment (informal sector) 0.80 (0.61, 1.05) 0.75 (0.52, 1.08)
Description of income level
 Less than 500 GHC 1.00 1.00
 500–1000 GHC 1.30 (0.95, 1.77) 1.15 (0.81, 1.64)
 1100–2000 1.04 (0.76, 1.41) 0.72 (0.51, 1.04)
 2100–3000 0.92 (0.59, 1.45) 0.70 (0.42, 1.15)
 3100–5000 1.62 (1.02, 2.55) 1.07 (0.63, 1.83)
Rate of socioeconomic status
 Very rich 1.00 1.00
 Rich 1.71 (1.00, 1.29) 1.57 (0.84, 2.95)
 Moderately rich 0.63 (0.41, 0.94) 0.64 (0.38, 1.08)
 Poor 0.31 (0.18, 0.53)∗∗∗ 0.28 (0.14, 0.51)∗∗∗
Residence
 Urban 1.26 (1.00, 1.59)
 Periurban 1.00
Description of residency
 Estate 1.00 1.00
 New site 0.85 (0.63, 1.15) 0.94 (0.66, 1.34)
 Inner city/old town 0.90 (0.68, 1.19) 1.22 (0.85, 1.74)
 Slums/zongos/others 0.55 (0.37, 0.92)∗∗ 0.74 (0.46, 1.20)
Region
 Western 1.00 1.00
 Northern 0.82 (0.59, 1.13) 1.05 (0.69, 1.58)
 Greater accra 0.99 (0.74, 1.33) 1.04 (0.72, 1.50)
 Ashanti 1.32 (0.99, 1.76) 1.52 (1.04,2.22)

SWM, solid waste management. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.