Skip to main content
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva logoLink to Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):471–478. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180068

Glycemia upon admission and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit

Luis Miguel Toro-Polo 1,2,, Ricardo Yannick Ortiz-Lozada 1, Silvana Lucia Chang-Grozo 1, Adrian V Hernandez 1,4, Raffo Escalante-Kanashiro 1,3, Lely Solari-Zerpa 1
PMCID: PMC6334488  PMID: 30672971

Abstract

Objectives

To analyze the association between glycemia levels upon pediatric intensive care unit admission and mortality in patients hospitalized.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of pediatric intensive care unit patients admitted to the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño between 2012 and 2013. A Poisson regression model with robust variance was used to quantify the association. Diagnostic test performance evaluation was used to describe the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratios for each range of glycemia.

Results

In total, 552 patients were included (median age 23 months, age range 5 months to 79.8 months). The mean glycemia level upon admission was 121.3mg/dL (6.73mmol/L). Ninety-two (16.6%) patients died during hospitalization. In multivariable analyses, significant associations were found between glycemia < 65mg/dL (3.61mmol/L) (RR: 2.01, 95%CI 1.14 - 3.53), glycemia > 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) (RR: 2.91, 95%CI 1.71 - 4.55), malnutrition (RR: 1.53, 95%CI 1.04 - 2.25), mechanical ventilation (RR: 3.71, 95%CI 1.17 - 11.76) and mortality at discharge. There was low sensitivity (between 17.39% and 39.13%) and high specificity (between 49.13% and 91.74%) for different glucose cut-off levels.

Conclusion

There was an increased risk of death at discharge in patients who developed hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia upon admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. Certain glucose ranges (> 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) and < 65mg/dL (3.61mmol/L)) have high specificity as predictors of death at discharge.

Keywords: Hypoglycemia; Hyperglycemia; Infant mortality; Intensive care units, pediatric

INTRODUCTION

The mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) is high, and developing countries are the most affected. Campos-Miño et al.(1) found that the average Latin American PICU mortality was 13.29% in contrast to 5% in European countries. In Peru, León et al.(2) in 1996 and Tantaleán et al.(3) studied the mortality at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño (INSN) PICU and found percentages of 26% and 21%, respectively, which also showed marked differences compared with other countries.

The association between hyperglycemia and mortality has been well studied.(4,5) Umpierrez et al.(6) found that hyperglycemia (defined as serum glucose > 126mg/dL (6.99mmol/L)) is common among hospitalized patients and should be considered an important marker of poor clinical response and increased mortality, especially in patients admitted to critical care units.(5,6) In addition, Branco et al. studied the relationship between blood glucose levels and mortality in children with septic shock, finding that a level of glycemia greater than 176mg/dL is associated with a higher risk of death.(7)

In contrast, several authors have found that hypoglycemia is the most common alteration in the serum glucose concentration(8) and the most frequent metabolic disorder in childhood.(9) The NICE-SUGAR (Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation-Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation) study, done in critically ill patients, found an association between moderate and severe hypoglycemia (serum glucose levels of 41 - 70mg/dL (2.28 - 3.89mmol/L) and < 40mg/dL (2.22mmol/L), respectively) and increased risk of death, especially in patients with severe hypoglycemia and in those who sustained hypoglycemia for more than one day.(10)

Assessments of the severity, clinical instability and prognosis are the main challenges to be faced in the pediatric intensive care unit, requiring effective and continuous assessment in critically ill patients.(11) Currently, there are several scoring systems that predict mortality in PICUs, such as Pediatric RIsk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) and its updates. However, these all have drawbacks, such as a large amount of information being required or a complex mathematical formula to calculate the probability of death,(12) which makes their application complex.(13)

It would therefore be useful to have alternative clinical predictors of mortality in the PICUs. Serum glucose is a simple measure, quick and easy to obtain, and therefore meets the criteria for evaluation as a predictor in dynamic environments, such as the PICU.(14) The objective of this study was to determine the PICU admission glycemia levels that are associated with in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort performed at the PICU of the Peruvian INSN between 2012 and 2013. This referral center is a specialized institute of high complexity; its PICU has 23 beds (16 beds for acute and 7 for chronic patients) and recorded 409 hospital discharges in 2012 (34 monthly discharges).(15) The average length of stay (LOS) was 12 days. The Crude Mortality Rate recorded in 2012 in the service was 18.3%, and the Net Mortality Rate, which only considers the subsequent deaths within 48 hours of admission, was 17.8%.(15)

The study population consists of children between 29 days and 18 years of age admitted during the mentioned period, and they were categorized by age groups (1 - 6 months, 7 - 12 months, 1 - 5 years, 6 - 15 years old, and > 15 years). Neither patients without serum glucose measurement within the first 24 hours of admission to the PICU nor those who stayed less than that time were considered. Patients without complete information of cause of death or anthropometric data and patients with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or insulinoma were excluded.

The main outcome was death at discharge of the PICU. The exposure variable was the glucose category, defined as the first serum glucose level measured at admission to the PICU obtained by venipuncture, expressed in mg/dL, taken from the medical registries, and categorized into the following groups:(16,17) Group 1 (< 65mg/dL or 3.61mmol/L), Group 2 (66 - 100mg/dL or 3.66 - 5.55mmol/L), Group 3 (101 - 199mg/dL or 5.61 - 11.04mmol/L), Group 4 (> 200mg/dL or >11.1mmol/L). When more than one glycemia sample was drawn during the first 24 hours, the first one was chosen for the study in all the included patients.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas and the Oficina Ejecutiva de Apoyo a la Investigación y Docencia Especializadas (OEAIDE) from the INSN.

Informed consent was not accomplished as there was no contact with the patients. Medical records were used as a source of information. Data were collected by health workers of the PICU after capacitation. Death of patients was confirmed by clinical history and death certificate. The data were entered into a database in Microsoft Excel 2010, and quality control was performed by double digitization of data.

Statistical analyses

Data analysis was performed using the statistical package STATA 13.0. A p of < 0.05 was considered significant.

For univariate analyses, the categorical variables were expressed as frequencies (percentages). Continuous variables were described as the means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges.

For bivariate analyses, normality and homogeneity of variances were evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene test, respectively. The comparison of categorical variables was performed using the Chi square test for parametrical variables and Fisher's exact test for nonparametrical variables.

For bivariate and multivariate analyses, Poisson regression models with robust variance were performed. Variables with a p < 0.05 in bivariate analyses were considered for multivariable analyses. Associations were reported as relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Glycemia between 66 - 100mg/dL (3.66 - 5.55mmol/L) (group 2) was considered as the reference group for glucose categories and group etiology respiratory for diagnosis upon admission.

Additionally, the statistical methodology of the diagnostic test was used to indicate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratios for each range of glycemia. A 95%CI was also provided.

RESULTS

A census of this population was performed, which was composed of 552 patients. Overall, 769 patients were hospitalized in the PICU during the study period; 217 patients were excluded, including neonates (n = 28), patients who stayed less than 24 hours in the PICU (n = 5), patients lacking anthropometric data (n = 95) and patients lacking glucose data (n = 89), resulting in 552 patients included in the analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of patients included in the analysis. PICU - pediatric intensive care unit.

The median age was 23 months (IQR = 5 - 79.75), and 52.3% were male. The mean blood glucose level upon admission was 121.30mg/dL (6.73mmol/L). Two hundred seventy (48.9%) patients presented glucose levels in Group 3 (101 - 199mg/dL or 5.61 - 11.04mmol/L), followed by 33.0% in Group 2 (66 - 100mg/dL or 3.66 - 5.55mmol/L). Ninety-two (16.7%) patients died. The most frequent diagnoses upon admission were noncardiovascular surgery (38.5%) and respiratory disease (23.2%). Four hundred sixty-two (83.5%) patients required mechanical ventilation, 14.1% parenteral nutrition and 17.2% presented infection in the PICU (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 552)

Patient characteristics Total
Age, months 23 (5.0 - 79.8)
Sex  
     Male 289 (52.3)
Glucose 121.30 (70.6)
Glucose group  
     < 65 mg/dL 54 (9.78)
     (< 3.61 mmol/L)  
     66 – 100 mg/dL  182 (33.0)
     (3.66 - 5.55 mmol/L)  
     101 – 199 mg/dL 270 (48.9)
     (5.61 - 11.04 mmol/L)  
     > 200 mg/dL 46 (8.3)
     (> 11.1 mmol/L)  
     Diagnoses upon admission  
     Respiratory 128 (23.2)
     Infectious 97 (17.6)
     Neurological 37 (6.7)
     Noncardiovascular surgery 213 (38.6)
     Others 77 (14.0)
Mechanical ventilation 462 (83.5)
Obese 4 (0.7)
Malnutrition 114 (20.6)
Eutrophic 434 (78.6)
Infection in the PICU 95 (17.2)
Parenteral nutrition 78 (14.1)
Death at discharge 92 (16.6)

PICU - pediatric intensive care unit. The results expressed as the median (IQR), n (%) or mean (standard deviation).

There was a significant association between glucose groups (p < 0.001), diagnoses upon admission (p < 0.001), nutritional status (p < 0.001), infection in the PICU (p = 0.006) mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and death during hospitalization (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association between patient characteristics and death during hospitalization

Characteristic Total Dead Alive p value
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Glucose       < 0.001
     < 65mg/dL 54 (9.8) 16 (29.6) 38 (70.4)  
     (< 3.61mmol/L)        
     66 - 100mg/dL 182 (33.0) 22 (12.1) 160 (87.9)  
     (3.66 - 5.55mmol/L)        
     101 - 199mg/dL 270 (48.9) 36 (13.3) 234 (86.7)  
     (5.61 - 11.04mmol/L)        
     > 200mg/dL 46 (8.3) 18 (39.1) 28 (80.9)  
     (> 11.1mmol/L)        
Age*       0.330
     1 - 6 months 163 (29.5) 35 (21.5) 128 (78.5)  
     7 - 12 months 66 (12.0) 12 (18.1) 54 (81.8)  
     1 - 5 years 160 (29.0) 21 (13.1) 139 (86.9)  
     6 - 15 years 141 (25.5) 21 (14.9) 120 (85.1)  
     15 - 18 years 22 (4.0) 3 (13.6) 19 (83.6)  
Sex       0.790
     Male 289 (52.4) 47 (16.3) 242 (83.7)  
     Female 263 (47.6) 45 (17.1) 218 (82.9)  
Diagnoses upon admission       < 0.001
     Respiratory 128 (23.1) 26 (20.3) 102 (79.7)  
     Infectious 97 (17.6) 29 (29.9) 68 (70.1)  
     Noncardiovascular surgery 213 (38.6) 11 (5.1) 202 (94.8)  
     Neurological 37 (6.7) 5 (13.5) 32 (86.4)  
     Others 77 (14.0) 21 (27.2) 56 (72.7)  
Nutritional status*       0.009
     Obesity 4 (0.7) 0 (0) 4 (100.0)  
     Malnutrition 114 (20.6) 33 (29.0) 81 (71.0)  
     Eutrophic 434 (78.6) 59 (16.6) 375 (83.4)  
Mechanical ventilation*       < 0.001
     Yes 462 (83.5) 89 (19.3) 373 (80.7)  
     No 90 (16.5) 3 (3.3) 87 (96.7)  
Parenteral nutrition       0.101
     Yes 78 (14.1) 18 (23.1) 60 (76.9)  
     No 474 (85.9) 74 (15.6) 400 (84.4)  
Infection in the PICU       0.006
     Yes 95 (17.2) 25 (26.3) 70 (73.7)  
     No 457 (82.8) 67 (14.7) 390 (85.3)  

PICU - pediatric intensive care unit.

*

Fisher’s exact test.

However, multivariate analyses showed that the following variables remained associated with mortality during hospitalization: glucose < 65mg/dL (3.61mmol/L) (RR: 2.01; 95%CI 1.14 - 3.53), glucose > 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) (RR: 2.91; 95%CI 1.71 - 4.55), malnutrition (RR: 1.53; 95%CI 1.04 - 2.25) and mechanical ventilation (RR: 3.71; 95%CI 1.17 - 11.76) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Bivariate and multivariate analyses for death during hospitalization

Variable Crude analyses Adjusted analyses
RR 95%CI p value RR 95%CI p value
Group 1 - < 65mg/dL 2.45 (1.38 - 4.32) 0.002 2.01 (1.14 - 3.53) 0.015
(< 3.61mmol/L)            
Group 2 - 66 – 100mg/ dL 1.00 (Reference)   1.00 (Reference)  
(3.66 - 5.55mmol/L)            
Group 3 - 101 – 199mg /dL 1.10 (0.67 - 1.81) 0.699 1.41 (0.86 - 2.30) 0.172
(5.61 - 11.04 mmol/L)            
Group 4 - >200 mg/dL 3.23 (1.89 - 5.51) < 0.001 2.91 (1.71 - 4.55) < 0.001
(> 11.1mmol/L)            
Respiratory diagnosis 1.00 (Reference)   1.00 (Reference)  
Infectious diagnosis 1.47 (0.92 - 2.32) 0.099 1.51 (0.95 - 2.38) 0.076
Noncardiovascular surgery diagnosis 0.25 (0.13 - 0.49) < 0.001 0.31 (0.15 - 0.63) 0.001
Neurological diagnosis 0.66 (0.27 - 1.61) 0.367 0.85 (0.37 - 1.99) 0.724
Others 1.34 (0.81- 2.21) 0.249 1.22 (0.71 - 2.08) 0.466
Malnutrition 2.14 (1.47 - 3.12) < 0.001 1.53 (1.04 - 2.25) 0.030
Mechanical ventilation 5.77 (1.86 - 17.85) 0.002 3.71 (1.17 - 11.76) 0.025
Infection in the PICU 1.79 (1.19 - 2.68) 0.004 1.21 (0.79 - 1.86) 0.369

RR – relative risk; 95%CI- 95% confidence interval; PICU - pediatric intensive care unit.

In the diagnostic test analysis (Table 4), low sensitivity values were found for all ranges of glucose for the prediction of mortality. However, a high specificity (91.7%) was found for glucose values of < 65mg/dL (3.61mmol/L) and for values > 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) (93.9%). Neither the positive nor the negative likelihood ratios could be considered of significant clinical value. When performing the ROC curve, we found an area under the curve of 0.53 (95%CI 0.45 to 0.60) (Figure 2).

Table 4.

Performance of the ranges of glucose as predictors of mortality at discharge

Glycemia Sensibility(%) Specificity(%) Positive predictive value Negative predictive value Positivelikelihood ratio Negativelikelihood ratio
≤ 65mg/dL 17.4 91.7 29.6 84.7 2.1 0.9
(< 3,61mmol/L)            
66 - 100mg/dL 23.9 65.2 12.1 81.1 0.7 1.2
(3,66 - 5,55mmol/L)            
101 - 199mg/dL 39.1 49.1 13.3 80.1 0.8 1.2
(5,61 - 11,04mmol/L)            
> 200mg/dL 19.6 93.9 39.1 85.4 3.2 0.9
(> 11,1mmol/L)            

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ROC curve.

Finally, patients with glucose values < 50mg/dL (2.78mmol/L) had a mortality of 43.4% in comparison with patients with glucose values of ≥ 250mg/dL (13.88mmol/L), who had 37.1% of mortality. As shown, in the extreme ranges of glycemia, hypoglycemia has higher percentages of mortality than hyperglycemia.

DISCUSSION

Patients with hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia upon admission to the PICU showed an increased risk of death at discharge. The group with the highest risk of death was that with glucose levels > 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) followed by those with glucose levels < 65mg/dL (3.61mmol/L).

With respect to children with hyperglycemia, these findings are consistent with those of Park et al.,(16) who showed that patients with hyperglycemia > 300mg/dL (> 16.65mmol/L) had a higher death rate at discharge compared to patients who had glycemia between 100 and 199mg/dL (5.61 - 11.04mmol/L). The results are also similar to those made by Klein et al., who studied 1550 hospitalized children in the PICU and concluded that patients with glucose levels > 200mg/dL (> 11.1mmol/L) on the first day of PICU admission had a significantly higher mechanical ventilation time, longer stays in the PICU and lower survival rates compared with those who had normal blood glucose levels.(18)

It has been proposed that the liberation of disease-induced stress hormones, such as epinephrine and cortisol, leads to hepatic glycogenolysis mediated by catecholamines, as well as direct sympathetic stimulation of glycogen breakdown that leads to hyperglycemia.(16) Furthermore, use of intravenous dextrose, plus the exogenous use of glucocorticoids and catecholamines, might contribute to an increase in glucose levels. On the other hand, hyperglycemia has multiple effects on the body, such as immunosuppression, which leads to infection, increased blood pressure and natriuretic peptide levels, and platelet hyperactivity, which lead to thrombotic events and neuronal damage that can induce cerebral ischemia and death.(16)

The association between hypoglycemia and mortality has been studied previously. A study in the pediatric population at the Befelatanana University Hospital (Madagascar)(19) found that children with hypoglycemia (glycemia < 40mg/dL or 2.22mmol/L) had the highest risk of death (RR: 12.2; 95%CI: 6.2 - 23.7), followed by those with hyperglycemia (glycemia > 150mg/dL or > 8.32mmol/L) (RR: 2.5; 95%CI: 1.0 - 6.2). The authors also found that children with hypoglycemia had a greater decrease in consciousness; increased vomiting; and higher incidence of severe illness, severe dehydration and severe malnutrition. Similarly, Osier et al.(8) in the Kilifi District Hospital in 1999, found that mortality of patients with hypoglycemia was higher than those with normoglycemia, especially in patients with severe signs of disease (prostration or deep breathing) and severe malnutrition. In addition, Egi et al.(20) found similar results regarding the association between hypoglycemia and death in critically ill patients at discharge.

Hypoglycemia causes impairment of autonomic function, release of inflammatory mediators and cytokines, alteration of blood flow and composition, white-cell activation and vasoconstriction. Severe hypoglycemia is associated with a prolonged QT interval and fatal cardiac arrhythmias.(10) These events can answer to a causal relationship, but hypoglycemia can only be a result of disease processes, which are responsible for death yet not the cause.(10) In this case, hypoglycemia could be used as a marker of the predisposition of death.

In contrast to the results found in this study, Blesa Malpica et al.,(21) Freire et al.(22) and Larrondo Muguercia et al.(23) concluded that glycemia during the first twenty-four hours was not a prognostic factor for mortality in critically ill patients. However, they found a linear relationship between elevated levels of glucose and severity of disease. Therefore, they concluded that blood glucose monitoring remains useful and necessary because its dysfunction expresses metabolic instability.

As for other variables associated with mortality in critically ill patients, Sambany et al.(19) found a significant association between hepatomegaly and coma and death. Furthermore, in the study of Srinivasan et al.,(24) infusion of vasoactive substances, such as epinephrine, was found to be associated with mortality. In adults, Freire et al.(22) reported that the severity of illness measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scale, severe hypoalbuminemia, severe lactic acidosis and mechanical ventilation showed independent associations with mortality.

Regarding the results obtained in the ROC curve, there was a low discrimination capacity. This is due to the objective nature of our study, that is, to find the best hyperglycemia, hyper and hypoglycemia values, which is why a traditional curve is distorted.

One of the strengths of our study is that is serves as a census of the attending pediatric population. In addition, we differentiated between surgical and medical causes in comparison with similar studies. Lastly, to our knowledge, this is the first study in the Latin-American population to address this issue.

Our study had several limitations. Certain variables were not taken into consideration because we were unable to gather their information, which could have influenced the association between glucose and mortality, such as the use of glucocorticoids or exogenous catecholamines, insulin therapy, disease severity measured by usual scales and nutrition 12 hours prior to admission.(19) We also did not consider when certain variables, such as mechanical ventilation, began during the patient's stay in the ICU. Furthermore, an analysis of the excluded patients was not executed.

It would be useful to rely on a marker that can identify patients with increased likelihood of death, therefore achieving better distribution of material and human resources, a goal that becomes more important when referring to developing countries.(3) This marker should be simple, readily available and fast, which would be helpful in a dynamic environment, such as the PICU. Measuring serum glucose meets these characteristics, and thus we evaluated it as a predictor of death at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a significant association between glucose and mortality at both extremes of the spectrum: hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Using these ranges of glucose as markers for mortality yielded very high specificities but suboptimal positive likelihood ratios. Pediatric intensivists should perform a careful monitoring of blood glucose, especially during the first twenty-four hours, since alterations in its levels are linked to adverse patient outcomes and to an increased risk of death at discharge.

Likewise, health professionals are recommended to identify the most vulnerable patients, based on the study's findings, to initiate early and effective treatment, thereby preventing and / or reducing mortality.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: None.

Responsible editor: Jefferson Pedro Piva

REFERENCES

  • 1.Campos-Miño S, Sasbón JS, von Dessauer B. Los cuidados intensivos pediátricos en Latinoamérica. Med Intensiva. 2012;36(1):3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.León R, Tantaleán J, Santos A. Uso del PRISM en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátrica. Intensivos. 2001;3:22–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tantaleán da Fieno JA, Paredes L, Santos Benevides A, Becerra Velásquez R. Riesgo de muerte en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos uso del prism. Rev Peru Pediatr. 2008;61(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wintergerst KA, Foster MB, Sullivan JE, Woods CR. Association of hyperglycemia, glucocorticoids, and insulin use with morbidity and mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(1):5–14. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kyle UG, Coss Bu JA, Kennedy CE, Jefferson LS. Organ dysfunction is associated with hyperglycemia in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(2):312–320. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1703-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(3):978–982. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.3.8341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Branco RG, Celiny PC, Piva JP, Casartelli CH, Seibel V, Tasker RC. Glucose level and risk of mortality in pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(4):470–472. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161284.96739.3A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Osier FH, Berkley JA, Ross A, Sanderson F, Mohammed S, Newton CR. Abnormal blood glucose concentrations on admission to a rural Kenyan district hospital prevalence and outcome. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(7):621–625. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.7.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aynsley-Green A. Glucose, the brain and the paediatric endocrinologist. Horm Res. 1996;46(1):8–25. doi: 10.1159/000184971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Finfer S, Liu B, Chittock DR, Norton R, Myburgh JA, McArthur C, et al. Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1108–1118. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gemke RJ, Bonsel GJ, van Vught AJ. Outcome assessment and quality assurance in pediatric intensive care. In: Tibboel D, van der Voort E, editors. Intensive Care in Childhood. Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 1996. pp. 117–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prieto Espuñes S, López-Herce Cid J, Rey Galán C, Medina Villanueva A, Concha Torre A, Martínez Camblor P. Índices pronósticos de mortalidad en cuidados intensivos pediátricos. An Pediatr (Barc) 2007;66(4):345–350. doi: 10.1157/13101237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martinez Castrejón M. Índice de mortalidad y factores de riesgo de muerte en el paciente pediátrico con cuidados intensivos del Hospital Regional Río Blanco. Rio Blanco: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Veracruzana; 2008. [2016 Jul 24]. [tesis] Disponible en: http://cdigital.uv.mx/handle/123456789/31171. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kelley MA. Predictive scoring systems in the intensive care unit. [2016 Jul 24]. UpToDate. Disponible en: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/predictive-scoring-systems-in-the-intensive-care-unit.
  • 15.Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño Análisis Situacional de los Servicios de INSN Año: 2012. Información para la toma de decisiones en salud. [2016 Jul 24]. Disponible en: http://www.insn.gob.pe/sites/default/files/publicaciones/ASIS%20INSN-v12.pdf.
  • 16.Park BS, Yoon JS, Moon JS, Won KC, Lee HW. Predicting mortality of critically ill patients by blood glucose levels. Diabetes Metab J. 2013;37(5):385–390. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2013.37.5.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wintergerst K, Buckingham B, Gandrud L, Wong BJ, Kache S, Wilson DM. Association of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glucose variability with morbidity and death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):173–179. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klein GW, Hojsak JM, Schmeidler J, Rapaport R. Hyperglycemia and outcome in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2008;153(3):379–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sambany E, Pussard E, Rajaonarivo C, Raobijaona H, Barennes H. Childhood dysglycemia prevalence and outcome in a referral hospital. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e65193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, et al. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3):217–224. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Blesa Malpica AL, Cubells Romeral M, Morales Sorribas E, Tejero Redondo A, Martínez Sagasti F, Martín Benítez JC, et al. La glucemia de las primeras 24 horas no es un factor pronóstico de mortalidad en pacientes críticos. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(3):622–635. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Freire AX, Bridges L, Umpierrez GE, Kuhl D, Kitabchi AE. Admission hyperglycemia and other risk factors as predictors of hospital mortality in a medical ICU population. Chest. 2005;128(5):3109–3116. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Larrondo Muguercia HM, Jiménez Paneque R, Torres Hernández MR, Roque Guerra A, León Pérez D. Valoración de la glucemia sérica como marcador pronóstico en el paciente séptico crítico. Rev Cubana Endocrinol. 2010;21(3):269–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Srinivasan V, Spinella PC, Drott HR, Roth CL, Helfaer MA, Nadkarni V. Association of timing, duration, and intensity of hyperglycemia with intensive care unit mortality in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(4):329–336. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000128607.68261.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva are provided here courtesy of Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira

RESOURCES