Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;6:206. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00206

Table 1.

Properties and performances of different membranes in terms of CVN purification.

ID Material [–] Membrane area [m2] MWCO [kDa]a Pore radius [nm] Membrane thickness [μm] Permeate CVN recovery [% initial] Permeate TSP recovery [% initial] CVN Purity increase [–] Completed UFDF cycles [–]
A PSBC 1.7·10−3 ~150 8.5 50 73.90 93.92 0.79 4
B PSBC 1.7·10−3 ~325 12.0 11 92.89 78.73 1.18 2b
C PSBC 1.7·10−3 ~1,200 21.0 41 66.20 68.43 0.97 2b
D PSBC 1.7·10−3 ~3,500 34.0 31 81.03 62.54 1.30 3b
E PAN 1.7·10−3 ~215 10.0 40 101.22 92.29 1.10 4
F PVDF + 50% TiO2 1.7·10−3 ~40,000 100.0 40 52.49 79.67 0.66 4
n.a. RC 0.02 30 ~4.2 180 n.a. 0.42 n.a. 3
n.a. RC 0.02 100 ~7.1 180 69.75 17.06 3.14 4
n.a. PESU 0.02 100 ~7.1 120 45.22 10.82 3.49 4
n.a. PESU 0.02 300 ~11.6 120 n.a. 97.90 n.a. 3
a

MWCO was estimated based on Equation 1 for block copolymer materials.

b

The run was terminated due to the blocking of the membrane.