Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;122(1):13–25. doi: 10.1111/bju.14361

Table 3.

Consensus recommendations on clinical mpMRI reports

Recommendations on clinical mpMRI reports
  • The image quality of the mpMRI be reported.

  • mpMRI should be scored to rule out Gleason score 7 (including 3 + prominent 4), and/or volume ≥0.5 mL, and/or extraprostatic extension/seminal vesicle invasion.

  • The mpMRI scoring system recommended is the ‘Likert‐assessment’ system (both for lesion‐scoring and whole‐gland scoring).

  • Equivocal prostate mpMRI (Likert‐impression 3) should be double‐read if avoiding biopsy is under consideration.

  • Discordant mpMRI scores with biopsy results should be retrospectively double‐read.

  • The following should be scored on a 1–5 scale for likelihood of involvement:

    • Extraprostatic extension.

    • Seminal vesicle involvement.

    • Bladder neck involvement.

    • Neurovascular bundle involvement.

    • Rectal wall involvement.

    • Bladder wall involvement.

    • Peripheral zone (PZ) and Transition zone (TZ) tumour should be measured from any sequence on which it is best seen.

  • The following quantitative metrics should be included within an mpMRI report:

    • Prostate gland volume and tumour size should be measured on T2‐weighted imaging using 3‐diameters × 0.52 (prolate ellipse formula).

    • To ensure consistency, tumour should be measured as 3‐diameters or volume estimation by the product of 3 diameters × 0.52.

    • For software‐targeted biopsy purposes, tumour should be contoured on the sequence required by targeted biopsy fusion software.

    • For targeted biopsy purposes, in a lesion >1 cm, the most suspicious area/spot for significant tumour, (i.e. the ‘hot‐spot’) should be additionally indicated (e.g. by contouring, via arrow‐heads, etc.).